ArticleGlobal change biology2019
Spatial and habitat variation in aphid, butterfly, moth and bird phenologies over the last half century.
Article in Global change biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 30 years of climate related phenological research: themes and trends.International journal of biometeorology · 2025Pooled it
- Spatiotemporal Dynamics and Outbreak Risk ofInsects · 2026Article
- Modelling asynchrony in phenology considering a dynamic representation of meteorological variables.PeerJ · 2025Article
- Resolving biology's dark matter: species richness, spatiotemporal distribution, and community composition of a dark taxon.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Prediction of the Current and Future Distribution of Tomato Leafminer in China Using the MaxEnt Model.Insects · 2023Article
- Article
- The Distribution Pattern and Species Richness of Scorpionflies (Mecoptera: Panorpidae).Insects · 2023Article
- Metabarcoding dietary analysis in the insectivorous batBiodiversity data journal · 2023Article
- From identification to forecasting: the potential of image recognition and artificial intelligence for aphid pest monitoring.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- rGAI: An R package for fitting the generalized abundance index to seasonal count data.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Differences in phenology, daily timing of activity, and associations of temperature utilization with survival in three threatened butterflies.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Urbanization extends flight phenology and leads to local adaptation of seasonal plasticity in Lepidoptera.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Inter-sexual and inter-generation differences in dispersal of a bivoltine butterfly.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Effect of dietary supplementation of Emblica officinalis fruit pomace on methane emission, ruminal fermentation, nutrient utilization, and milk production performance in buffaloes.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Extreme events are more likely to affect the breeding success of lesser kestrels than average climate change.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Are insects declining and at what rate? An analysis of standardised, systematic catches of aphid and moth abundances across Great Britain.Insect conservation and diversity · 2020Article
- Spatial and habitat variation in aphid, butterfly, moth and bird phenologies over the last half century.Global change biology · 2019Article
- Predicting climate-driven shifts in the breeding phenology of Varied Tits (Animal cells and systems · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Global warming has advanced the timing of biological events, potentially leading to disruption across trophic levels. The potential importance of phenological change as a driver of population trends has been suggested. To fully understand the possible impacts, there is a need to quantify the scale of these changes spatially and according to habitat type. We studied the relationship between phenological trends, space and habitat type between 1965 and 2012 using an extensive UK dataset comprising 269 aphid, bird, butterfly and moth species. We modelled phenologies using generalized additive mixed models that included covariates for geographical (latitude, longitude, altitude), temporal (year, season) and habitat terms (woodland, scrub, grassland). Model selection showed that a baseline model with geographical and temporal components explained the variation in phenologies better than either a model in which space and time interacted or a habitat model without spatial terms. This baseline model showed strongly that phenologies shifted progressively earlier over time, that increasing altitude produced later phenologies and that a strong spatial component determined phenological timings, particularly latitude. The seasonal timing of a phenological event, in terms of whether it fell in the first or second half of the year, did not result in substantially different trends for butterflies. For moths, early season phenologies advanced more rapidly than those recorded later. Whilst temporal trends across all habitats resulted in earlier phenologies over time, agricultural habitats produced significantly later phenologies than most other habitats studied, probably because of nonclimatic drivers. A model with a significant habitat-time interaction was the best-fitting model for birds, moths and butterflies, emphasizing that the rates of phenological advance also differ among habitats for these groups. Our results suggest the presence of strong spatial gradients in mean seasonal timing and nonlinear trends towards earlier seasonal timing that varies in form and rate among habitat types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.