Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30761523›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of pharmacology2019

Neprilysin inhibition for pulmonary arterial hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial.

Adrian J Hobbs, Amie J Moyes, Reshma S Baliga, Dipa Ghedia, Rachel Ochiel, Yvonne Sylvestre, Caroline J Doré, Kashfia Chowdhury, Kate Maclagan, Harriet L Quartly and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Cyclic GMP and PKG Signaling in Heart Failure.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Review
  9. Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Diagnosis, Treatment, and Novel Advances.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Cardiac natriuretic peptides.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Adrian J HobbsWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3589-7108
Amie J MoyesWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Reshma S BaligaWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Dipa GhediaDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rachel OchielDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Yvonne SylvestreComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Caroline J DoréComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9796-4970
Kashfia ChowdhuryComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Kate MaclaganComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Harriet L QuartlyComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK.
Reecha SofatCentre for Clinical Pharmacology, Rayne Institute, London, UK.
Angelique SmitDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Benjamin E SchreiberDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Gerry J CoghlanDepartment of Cardiology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Raymond J MacAllisterDorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorset, UK.
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBDorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Clinical Research · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/11/88/28992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is an incurable, incapacitating disorder resulting from increased pulmonary vascular resistance, pulmonary arterial remodelling, and right ventricular failure. In preclinical models, the combination of a PDE5 inhibitor (PDE5i) with a neprilysin inhibitor augments natriuretic peptide bioactivity, promotes cGMP signalling, and reverses the structural and haemodynamic deficits that characterize PAH. Herein, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of repurposing the neprilysin inhibitor, racecadotril, in PAH. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Twenty-one PAH patients stable on PDE5i therapy were recruited. Acute haemodynamic and biochemical changes following a single dose of racecadotril or matching placebo were determined; this was followed by a 14-day safety and efficacy evaluation. The primary endpoint in both steps was the maximum change in circulating atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) concentration (Δ KEY

resultsAcute administration of racecadotril (100 mg) resulted in a 79% increase in the plasma ANP concentration and a 106% increase in plasma cGMP levels, with a concomitant 14% fall in pulmonary vascular resistance. Racecadotril (100 mg; t.i.d.) treatment for 14 days resulted in a 19% rise in plasma ANP concentration. Neither acute nor chronic administration of racecadotril resulted in a significant drop in mean arterial BP or any serious adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: This Phase IIa evaluation provides proof-of-principle evidence that neprilysin inhibitors may have therapeutic utility in PAH and warrants a larger scale prospective trial.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeprilysinPulmonary Arterial HypertensionYoung AdultNeprilysin

Identifiers

PMID30761523
PMCPMC7651846
OpenAlexW2912986738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.