ReviewClinical child and family psychology review2019
Is the Concept of Self-Regulation Useful for Supporting Effective Implementation in Community Settings?
Review in Clinical child and family psychology review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Is it Time to Rethink a Common Approach in the Study of Parent Participation in Parenting Interventions? (Null) Findings from a Large-Scale Cluster Randomised Trial.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
- Toward a Three-Tier Model of Parental Self-regulation: A Scoping Review of Existing Definitions and Operationalisations.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2026Review
- Leveraging Ergonomics and Human Factors (E/HF) for community impact: what have we learned about how to make a difference.Ergonomics · 2025Article
- The "good enough" facilitator: elucidating the role of working alliance in the mechanism of facilitation.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Collaborative Working Relationships Between Community Prevention Coalitions and Their Technical Assistance Providers: A Mixed Methods Approach for the Development of an Innovative Implementation Measure.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025Article
- The Change of Practitioner's Self-Efficacy in Triple P Professional Training: Moderating Role of Practitioner Characteristics, Country, and Delivery Mode.Journal of child and family studies · 2023Article
- Mechanisms of change in external implementation support: A conceptual model and case examples to guide research and practice.Implementation research and practiceArticle
- Trajectory of external implementation support activities across two states in the United States: A descriptive study.Implementation research and practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The literature and utility of self-regulation extends beyond individuals; a critical factor for successful and sustainable implementation of evidence-based programs in a community setting may be the capacity of teams to self-regulate implementation processes. The conceptual foundation of this proposal is explored and definitions of the five dimensions of self-regulation for implementation processes are provided. Practice examples illustrate how the provision of external implementation support to build self-regulatory capacity among implementation teams adopting and scaling-up EBPs in the local community setting has shaped and refined the proposed definitions to better reflect the work on-the-ground. The role of external implementation support providers in developing implementation team self-regulation is explored and practice strategies to promote self-regulation are provided. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30761434What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.