Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30761418›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2020

Addressing climate change through a market mechanism: a comparative study of the pilot emission trading schemes in China.

Yu Zhou, Jingjing Jiang, Bin Ye, Yumeng Zhang, Jing Yan

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Allocation of carbon emission allowance based on DLA-GA model: a case study in China.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Spatio-temporal variation and daily prediction of PMEnvironmental geochemistry and health · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu ZhouSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, No 1088, Xueyuan Rd., Nanshan District, Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China.
Jingjing JiangSchool of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518055, China.
Bin YeSchool of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, No 1088, Xueyuan Rd., Nanshan District, Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China. yeb@sustc.edu.cn.
Yumeng ZhangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Jing YanInstitute of Urban and Rural Economics, Anhui Academic of Social Sciences, Hefei, 230001, Anhui, China.

Funding

China Scholarship Council 201506340061Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil and Groundwater Pollution Control 2017B030301012National Natural Science Foundation of China 71603110National Natural Science Foundation of China 71771130National Natural Science Foundation of China 71803074Southern University of Science and Technology G01296001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The questions of how to mitigate climate change and its impact on human health are currently high on the Chinese agenda for future development. The emission trading scheme (ETS) has become one of China's most important instruments to address climate change through a market mechanism. In the wake of the evolution from regional pilots to a nationwide scheme, it is inevitable to be confronted with tremendous political-economic-institutional challenges. To facilitate a smooth start-up of the upcoming nationwide ETS, this study provides a systematic overview of seven ETS pilots, involving the detailed comparison of ETS design and the in-depth evaluation of market performance, both internal and external performance, based on trading data. Then, the achievements and deficiencies of seven ETS pilots are summarized, several challenges for the current time are discussed, and policy proposals for China's national-level ETS are navigated further coupled with international experience. This study finds that China's ETS pilots, from the short-term perspective, are successful, especially in the reinforcement of China's capacity to develop a market-based scheme in an economy that still cherishes many non-market endowments. However, deficiencies lie in both the internal and external market performance, such as the carbon price lacking a signal function, insufficient incentives for compliance, too low market liquidity, and much too high market fragmentation. Moreover, the retrospective examination of China's ETS pilots suggests that a nationwide ETS should at least be based on an extension of the cap duration from single year to several years, uniform rules on monitoring/reporting/verification and allowance allocation, and the improvement of institutional foundation.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeCarbonChinaCosts and Cost AnalysisEnvironmental PolicyGreenhouse GasesPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesCarbonGreenhouse GasesCap-and-tradeChinaEmission trading scheme pilotsMarket performanceMechanism design

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.