Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30761357›Full record

ReviewReproductive biomedicine & society online2018

Effects of patient education on desire for twins and use of elective single embryo transfer procedures during ART treatment: A systematic review.

Saswati Sunderam, Sheree L Boulet, Denise J Jamieson, Dmitry M Kissin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Addressing multiple pregnancies in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: Current status, challenges, and solutions.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2018.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2017.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2016.Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Saswati SunderamNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sheree L BouletNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Denise J JamiesonEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Dmitry M KissinNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twin births among users of assisted reproductive technology (ART) pose serious risks to both mothers and infants. However, patients may prefer twins and may be unaware of the risks of twin pregnancies. Increasing use of elective single embryo transfers (eSET) through improved patient education could help to reduce twin births and related adverse health consequences. A systematic review of PUBMED and EMBASE databases was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of patient education among ART users on knowledge of twin pregnancy risks, desire for twins, preference for or use of eSET, and twin pregnancy rates. Of 187 references retrieved, six met the selection criteria. Most focused on patients undergoing their first ART cycle aged < 35 years. Patient education was delivered via written materials, DVDs or discussion. Four studies reporting on knowledge of risks or desire for twins showed significant effects of oral and written descriptions of multiple pregnancy complications, risks of twins versus singletons, and DVDs with factual information. Five studies showed increased eSET use or preference after patients were educated on the risks of multiple pregnancy and success rates associated with different types of ART procedures, when combined with clinic policies that supported single blastocyst transfers or provided options for insurance. In younger ART users, patient education on twin pregnancy risks and success rates of eSET may improve knowledge of twin pregnancy risks and increase use of eSET, and may be important for wider implementation of eSET in countries such as the USA where the use of eSET remains low. Clinic policies of single blastocyst transfers or financial incentives may strengthen these effects.

Indexed as

assisted reproductive technologymultiple pregnancy riskspatient educationsingle blastocyst transfersingle embryo transfer

Identifiers

PMID30761357
PMCPMC6287049
OpenAlexW2901445254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.