Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30761327›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2018

Blinded Visual Scoring of Images Using the Freely-available Software Blinder.

Steven D Cothren, Joel N Meyer, Jessica H Hartman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Swim exercise inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  17. eNeuro
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven D CothrenSolibyte Solutions, Durham, NC, USA.
Joel N MeyerNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Jessica H HartmanNicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Zebrafish as a Detector of Organophosphate ExposureP42ES010356 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI EDWARD D LEVIN · 2000 to 2026
$56.2M
Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Does exposure to mitochondrial toxicants during germ cell development result in lifelong alterations in mitochondrial function mediated by epigenetic changes?R01ES028218 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MEYER, JOEL NEWMAN · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
Role of Mitochondrial CYP2E1 in Chemical Exposure-Driven NeurodegenerationF32ES027306 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HARTMAN, JESSICA HELENE · 2016 to 2018
$171k
NIEHS NIH HHS F32 ES027306NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES010356NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES028218NIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In nearly all subfields of biomedical sciences, there are phenotypes that are currently classified by expert visual scoring. In research applications, these classifications require the experimenter to be blinded to the treatment group in order to avoid unintentional bias in scoring. Currently, many labs either use laborious and tedious methods to manually blind the images, require multiple experimenters to gather and score the data blindly or fail to properly blind the data altogether. In this protocol, we present a simple, freely available software that we created that allows the experimenter to blindly score images. In our protocol, the user loads unblinded images and defines a scoring system. The software then shows the user the images in a random order, allowing the user to select a score from their defined scoring system for each image. Furthermore, the software has an optional "quality control" mechanism where the user will be shown some images multiple times to test the robustness of the visual scoring. Finally, the software summarizes the results in an exportable file that includes unblinded summary data for each group and a full list of images with their scores. In this protocol, we briefly present directions for using the software, potential applications, and caveats/limitations to this approach.

Indexed as

BiasBlindBlinderClassificationDiagnosisHistopathologyImmunohistochemistryMicroscopyVisual scoring

Identifiers

PMID30761327
PMCPMC6370323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.