Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30761321›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of veterinary science and medicine2018

Evaluation of bull spermatozoa during and after cryopreservation: Structural and ultrastructural insights.

Wael A Khalil, Mostafa A El-Harairy, Alaa E B Zeidan, Mahmoud A E Hassan, Omnia Mohey-Elsaeed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of veterinary science and medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Study on the correlation of supplementation withFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wael A KhalilDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt.
Mostafa A El-HarairyDepartment of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt.
Alaa E B ZeidanAnimal Production Research Institute, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Mahmoud A E HassanAnimal Production Research Institute, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Omnia Mohey-ElsaeedDepartment of Cytology and Histology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Cairo University, Giza 12211, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Semen cryopreservation is a well-established procedure used in veterinary assisted reproduction technology applications. We investigated damaging effects of cryopreservation on the structural and ultrastructural characteristics of bull sperm induced at different temperatures and steps during standard cryopreservation procedure using transmission (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy. We also examined the effect of cryopreservation on sperm DNA and chromatin integrity. Five healthy, fertile Friesian bulls were used, and the ejaculates were obtained using an artificial vagina method. The semen samples were pooled and diluted in a tris-yolk fructose (TYF) for a final concentration of 80 × 10

Indexed as

AcrosomeBullChromatinCryopreservationMitochondriaSperm

Identifiers

PMID30761321
PMCPMC6161860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.