ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2019
Insight Into the Binding Mechanism of p53/pDIQ-MDMX/MDM2 With the Interaction Entropy Method.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Paired Database of Predicted and Experimental Protein Peptide Binding Information.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Revealing the pH-dependent conformational changes in sol g 2.1 protein and potential ligands binding.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Insights into the Interaction Mechanisms of Peptide and Non-Peptide Inhibitors with MDM2 Using Gaussian-Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Deep Learning.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Structural optimization of pyrrolopyrimidine BTK inhibitors based on molecular simulation.Journal of molecular modeling · 2023Article
- Hesperidin Inhibits the p53-MDMXInteraction-Induced Apoptosis of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Enhances the Antitumor Effect of Carboplatin.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
- HISNAPI: a bioinformatic tool for dynamic hot spot analysis in nucleic acid-protein interface with a case study.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Analysis of Kojic Acid Derivatives as Competitive Inhibitors of Tyrosinase: A Molecular Modeling Approach.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Structure-based designing efficient peptides based on p53 binding site residues to disrupt p53-MDM2/X interaction.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Computational Investigation on the p53-MDM2 Interaction Using the Potential of Mean Force Study.ACS omega · 2020Article
- Combined use of murine double minute-2 promoter methylation and serum AFP improves diagnostic efficiency in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.International journal of medical sciences · 2020Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of the p53-MDMX/MDM2 binding sites is a research hotspot for tumor drug design. The inhibition of p53-targeted MDMX/MDM2 has become an effective approach in anti-tumor drug development. In this paper, a theoretically rigorous and computationally accurate method, namely, the interaction entropy (IE) method, combined with the polarized protein-specific charge (PPC) force field, is used to explore the difference in the binding mechanism between p53-MDMX and p53-MDM2. The interaction of a 12mer peptide inhibitor (pDIQ), which is similar to p53 in structure, with MDMX/MDM2 is also studied. The results demonstrate that p53/pDIQ with MDM2 generates a stronger interaction than with MDMX. Compared to p53, pDIQ has larger binding free energies with MDMX and MDM2. According to the calculated binding free energies, the differences in the binding free energy among the four complexes that are obtained from the combination of PPC and IE are more consistent with the experimental values than with the results from the combination of the non-polarizable AMBER force field and IE. In addition, according to the decomposition of the binding free energy, the van der Waals (vdW) interactions are the main driving force for the binding of the four complexes. They are also the main source of the weaker binding affinity of p53/pDIQ-MDMX relative to p53/pDIQ-MDM2. Compared with p53-MDMX/MDM2, according to the analysis of the residue decomposition, the predicated total residue contributions are higher in pDIQ-MDMX/MDM2 than in p53-MDMX/MDM2, which explains why pDIQ has higher binding affinity than p53 with MDMX/MDM2. The current study provides theoretical guidance for understanding the binding mechanisms and designing a potent dual inhibitor that is targeted to MDMX/MDM2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.