Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30761195›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2019

Supplementation with a Multi-ingredient Pre-workout Supplement does not Augment Resistance Training Adaptations in Females.

Anna Nelson, Clayton L Camic, Carl Foster, Brooke Zajac, Kaela Hoecherl, Jacob Erickson, Andrew R Jagim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of exercise science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anna NelsonExercise & Sport Science Department, University of Wisconsin - La Crosse, La Crosse.
Clayton L CamicDepartment of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA; WI, USA.
Carl FosterExercise & Sport Science Department, University of Wisconsin - La Crosse, La Crosse.
Brooke ZajacExercise & Sport Science Department, University of Wisconsin - La Crosse, La Crosse.
Kaela HoecherlExercise & Sport Science Department, University of Wisconsin - La Crosse, La Crosse.
Jacob EricksonMayo Clinic Health Systems, Onalaska, WI, USA.
Andrew R JagimMayo Clinic Health Systems, Onalaska, WI, USA.
University of Wisconsin–La Crosse · USMayo Clinic Health System · USNorthern Illinois University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple ingredient pre-workout supplements (MIPS) are purported to offer favorable acute metabolic changes potentially leading to improvements in body composition and training adaptations over time. However, there is limited information available regarding the long-term benefits and safety of consuming MIPS, specifically in female populations. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of pre-workout ingestion on body composition, training adaptations and select markers of clinical health in recreationally active females after 7 weeks of supplementation and resistance training. Nineteen participants participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study. Experimental testing included resting heart rate and blood pressure, blood lipid panels, body composition, resting metabolic testing and performance measurements before and after a seven-week resistance training program while ingesting either a MIPS or placebo once daily. There were no significant group x time interactions for changes in body fat percentage (p=0.66), fat-free mass (p=0.87), fat mass (p=0.63) or resting metabolic rate (p=0.52). Both groups showed significant improvements in upper (p<0.001) and lower body (p<0.001) maximal strength following the 7-week training period however no differences in upper (p=0.74) and lower body (p=0.53) strength improvements were observed between groups, respectively. No significant group x time interactions were observed for any of the markers of clinical health. In conclusion, the current study suggests that daily consumption of a MIPS does not enhance training adaptations in recreationally active females and does not appear to negatively affect resting blood pressure, heart rate and blood lipids.

Indexed as

Ergogenic aidsperformance enhancing substancesthermogenics

Identifiers

PMID30761195
PMCPMC6355134
OpenAlexW2910315660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.