ReviewFrontiers in neurology2019
Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Injury: Prognostic Insights and Future Potentials.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fluid biomarkers for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- A comprehensive transcriptional reference for severity and progression in spinal cord injury reveals novel translational biomarker genes.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic Search and Modified e-Delphi Consensus for Serum Bone Biomarkers in Humans and Animal Models with SCI: Methodology.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Experimental treatments to attenuate blood spinal cord barrier rupture in rats with traumatic spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Early CSF Biomarkers and Late Functional Outcomes in Spinal Cord Injury. A Pilot Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Trial
- Focal Estrogen Therapy in Male Rats Promotes Neuronal Survival and Reduces Denervation Atrophy After Spinal Cord Injury via Modulation of β-Catenin and NF-κB.Neurochemical research · 2026Article
- Extracellular Vesicle-Based Biomarkers in Spinal Cord Injury: A State-of-the-Art Review on Diagnostic and Prognostic Advances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Rewiring the Lung-CNS Axis After Spinal Cord Injury.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Targeted delivery of Prussian blue modified exosomes to CD90-expressing synovial fibroblasts for Rheumatoid arthritis immunotherapy.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven multi-omics approaches in Alzheimer's disease: Progress, challenges, and future directions.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- The Role of Autophagy in Long-term Effects of Spinal Cord Injury: Does Exosome Change the Autophagy Process and Vice Versa?Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2025Review
- Modeling trajectories of routine blood tests as dynamic biomarkers for outcome in spinal cord injury.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Corticospinal Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation Propelling Sensorimotor Function Recovery in Complete Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- The Effect of Insomnia on the Outcomes of Physical Therapy in Patients with Cervical and Lumbar Pain in Clinical Practice.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Sacral Bioneuromodulation: The Role of Bone Marrow Aspirate in Spinal Cord Injuries.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Steroid inhibited Serpina3n expression which was positively correlated with the degrees of spinal cord injury.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Neuroinflammation in the Evolution of Motor Function in Stroke and Trauma Patients: Treatment and Potential Biomarkers.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) is a major challenge in Neurotrauma research. Complex pathophysiological processes take place immediately after the injury and later on as the chronic injury develops. Moreover, SCI is usually accompanied by traumatic injuries because the most common modality of injury is road traffic accidents and falls. Patients develop significant permanent neurological deficits that depend on the extent and the location of the injury itself and in time they develop further neurological and body changes that may risk their mere survival. In our review, we explored the recent updates with regards to SCI biomarkers. We observed two methods that may lead to the appearance of biomarkers for SCI. First, during the first few weeks following the injury the Blood Spinal Cord Barrier (BSCB) disruption that releases several neurologic structure components from the injured tissue. These components find their way to Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and the systemic circulation. Also, as the injury develops several components of the pathological process are expressed or released such as in neuroinflammation, apoptosis, reactive oxygen species, and excitotoxicity sequences. Therefore, there is a growing interest in examining any correlations between these components and the degrees or the outcomes of the injury. Additionally, some of the candidate biomarkers are theorized to track the progressive changes of SCI which offers an insight on the patients' prognoses, potential-treatments-outcomes assessment, and monitoring the progression of the complications of chronic SCI such as Pressure Ulcers and urinary dysfunction. An extensive literature review was performed covering literature, published in English, until February 2018 using the Medline/PubMed database. Experimental and human studies were included and titles, PMID, publication year, authors, biomarkers studies, the method of validation, relationship to SCI pathophysiology, and concluded correlation were reported. Potential SCI biomarkers need further validation using clinical studies. The selection of the appropriate biomarker group should be made based on the stage of the injuries, the accompanying trauma and with regards to any surgical, or medical interference that might have been done. Additionally, we suggest testing multiple biomarkers related to the several pathological changes coinciding to offer a more precise prediction of the outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.