Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30760643›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2019

Measuring network disruption in neurodegenerative diseases: New approaches using signal analysis.

Roisin McMackin, Muthuraman Muthuraman, Sergiu Groppa, Claudio Babiloni, John-Paul Taylor, Matthew C Kiernan, Bahman Nasseroleslami, Orla Hardiman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Roisin McMackinAcademic Unit of Neurology, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Muthuraman MuthuramanDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Sergiu GroppaDepartment of Neurology, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Claudio BabiloniDipartimento di Fisiologia e Farmacologia "Vittorio Erspamer", Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza", Roma, Italy.
John-Paul TaylorInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Matthew C KiernanBrain & Mind Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Bahman NasseroleslamiAcademic Unit of Neurology, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2227-2176
Orla HardimanAcademic Unit of Neurology, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland hardimao@tcd.ie.ORCID 0000-0003-2610-1291
Trinity College Dublin · IEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DENewcastle University · GBThe University of Sydney · AUUniversità degli studi di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced neuroimaging has increased understanding of the pathogenesis and spread of disease, and offered new therapeutic targets. MRI and positron emission tomography have shown that neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Lewy body dementia (LBD), Parkinson's disease (PD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and multiple sclerosis (MS) are associated with changes in brain networks. However, the underlying neurophysiological pathways driving pathological processes are poorly defined. The gap between what imaging can discern and underlying pathophysiology can now be addressed by advanced techniques that explore the cortical neural synchronisation, excitability and functional connectivity that underpin cognitive, motor, sensory and other functions. Transcranial magnetic stimulation can show changes in focal excitability in cortical and transcortical motor circuits, while electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography can now record cortical neural synchronisation and connectivity with good temporal and spatial resolution.Here we reflect on the most promising new approaches to measuring network disruption in AD, LBD, PD, FTD, MS, and ALS. We consider the most groundbreaking and clinically promising studies in this field. We outline the limitations of these techniques and how they can be tackled and discuss how these novel approaches can assist in clinical trials by predicting and monitoring progression of neurophysiological changes underpinning clinical symptomatology.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisElectroencephalographyFrontotemporal DementiaHumansLewy Body DiseaseMagnetoencephalographyNerve NetNeurodegenerative DiseasesParkinson DiseaseTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID30760643
PMCPMC6820156
OpenAlexW2914406193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.