Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30760606›Full record

ArticleBMJ quality & safety2019

MRI for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: simplifying complexity with a 'one-stop' service model.

Anish N Bhuva, Patricia Feuchter, Angela Hawkins, Lizette Cash, Redha Boubertakh, Jane Evanson, Richard Schilling, Martin Lowe, James C Moon, Charlotte H Manisty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ quality & safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anish N BhuvaDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK a.bhuva@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7532-7815
Patricia FeuchterDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Angela HawkinsDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Lizette CashDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Redha BoubertakhDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Jane EvansonDepartment of Radiology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Richard SchillingDepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Martin LoweDepartment of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
James C MoonDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Charlotte H ManistyDepartment of Cardiac Imaging, Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/16/46/32187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators are disadvantaged because of poor access to MRI scans, leading to late and misdiagnosis particularly for cancer and neurological disease. New technology allied to tested protocols now allows safe MRI scanning of such patients; however, logistical barriers persist.

aimTo deliver a streamlined sustainable service that provides timely MRI scans to patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).

methodsPatients requested a 'one-stop' service for MRI, whereby devices could be reprogrammed and scans acquired at a single location and visit. To provide this 'one-stop' service, we trained a team including administrators, physicians, cardiac physiologists and radiographers. A standard protocol was used to prevent unnecessary request refusals and delays to scheduling. Service volume, waiting time and safety were analysed 6 months before and 2 years after service redesign. Waiting times for internal and external inpatient referrals plus time to treatment for patients on a cancer pathway were analysed.

results215 MRI scans were performed over 2 years. After service redesign, MRI provision increased six-fold to 20 times the national average with reduced waiting time from 60 to 15 days and no adverse events. Departmental throughput was maintained. 85 (40%) referrals were external. 41 (19%) inpatients were scanned, reducing bed-stay by 3 days for internal referrals. 24 (11%) scans were for suspected cancer, 83% allowed treatment within the national standard of 62 days. There was no preintervention service for either inpatients or suspected cancer investigation.

conclusionImplementation of a 'one-stop' service model to provide MRI for patients with CIEDs is safe, streamlined, scalable and has reduced delays making economic and clinical sense. Protocols and checklists are available at mrimypacemaker.com.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantablePacemaker, ArtificialAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient SafetyQuality ImprovementStrokeCIEDhealth inequalityMRIQuality improvementteamwork

Identifiers

PMID30760606
PMCPMC6837254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.