Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30760546›Full record

ArticleGenome research2019

Evolution of gene regulation in ruminants differs between evolutionary breakpoint regions and homologous synteny blocks.

Marta Farré, Jaebum Kim, Anastasia A Proskuryakova, Yang Zhang, Anastasia I Kulemzina, Qiye Li, Yang Zhou, Yingqi Xiong, Jennifer L Johnson, Polina L Perelman and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  9. The Expansion of Sirtuin Gene Family in Gilthead Sea Bream (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Chromosomal conservatism vs chromosomal megaevolution: enigma of karyotypic evolution in Lepidoptera.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparative genomic analysis of 5MFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  19. Evolution of the ancestral mammalian karyotype and syntenic regions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

Marta Farré *Royal Veterinary College, University of London, London NW1 0TU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9170-5767
Jaebum Kim *Department of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul 05029, Korea.
Anastasia A ProskuryakovaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Yang ZhangComputational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Anastasia I KulemzinaInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Qiye LiChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Yang ZhouChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Yingqi XiongChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Jennifer L JohnsonDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
Polina L PerelmanInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Warren E JohnsonSmithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Front Royal, Virginia 22630, USA.
Wesley C WarrenBond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 63201, USA.
Anna V KukekovaDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
Guojie ZhangChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China.
Stephen J O'BrienTheodosius Dobzhansky Center for Genome Bioinformatics, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg 199004, Russia.
Oliver A RyderInstitute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo, Escondido, California 92027, USA.
Alexander S GraphodatskyInstitute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, SB RAS, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia.
Jian MaComputational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
Harris A LewinDepartment of Evolution and Ecology and the UC Davis Genome Center, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA.
Denis M LarkinRoyal Veterinary College, University of London, London NW1 0TU, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7859-6201
China National GeneBank · CNNovosibirsk State University · RUCarnegie Mellon University · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of London · GBInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology · RUKonkuk University · KRSan Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research · USSmithsonian Institution · USSt Petersburg University · RUUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

Integrated Interdisciplinary, inter-university PhD Program Computational Biology (T32)T32EB009403 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET, BAR-JOSEPH, ZIV · 2009 to 2023
$4.4M
Computational Methods for Next-Generation Comparative GenomicsR01HG007352 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI MA, JIAN · 2014 to 2023
$2.8M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J010170/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P020062/1NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007352NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of chromosome rearrangements in driving evolution has been a long-standing question of evolutionary biology. Here we focused on ruminants as a model to assess how rearrangements may have contributed to the evolution of gene regulation. Using reconstructed ancestral karyotypes of Cetartiodactyls, Ruminants, Pecorans, and Bovids, we traced patterns of gross chromosome changes. We found that the lineage leading to the ruminant ancestor after the split from other cetartiodactyls was characterized by mostly intrachromosomal changes, whereas the lineage leading to the pecoran ancestor (including all livestock ruminants) included multiple interchromosomal changes. We observed that the liver cell putative enhancers in the ruminant evolutionary breakpoint regions are highly enriched for DNA sequences under selective constraint acting on lineage-specific transposable elements (TEs) and a set of 25 specific transcription factor (TF) binding motifs associated with recently active TEs. Coupled with gene expression data, we found that genes near ruminant breakpoint regions exhibit more divergent expression profiles among species, particularly in cattle, which is consistent with the phylogenetic origin of these breakpoint regions. This divergence was significantly greater in genes with enhancers that contain at least one of the 25 specific TF binding motifs and located near bovidae-to-cattle lineage breakpoint regions. Taken together, by combining ancestral karyotype reconstructions with analysis of

Indexed as

Chromosome BreakpointsEvolution, MolecularSyntenyAnimalsDNA Transposable ElementsEnhancer Elements, GeneticKaryotypeProtein BindingRuminantsSelection, GeneticTranscription FactorsDNA Transposable ElementsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID30760546
PMCPMC6442394
OpenAlexW2911573918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.