Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30760510›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Support for smoke-free policy among Malaysian adults: findings from a population-based study.

Lim Kuang Hock, Lim Hui Li, Teh Chien Huey, Veloo Yuvaneswary, Pan Sayan, Muhammad Fadhli Muhd Yusoff, Lim Kuang Kuay, Ling Miaw Yn, Cheong Kee Chee, Ghazali Sumarni Mohd

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Support for smoke-free public places among adults in four countries in sub-Saharan Africa.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lim Kuang HockInstitute for Medical Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Lim Hui LiHospital Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah, Mentakab, Pahang, Malaysia.
Teh Chien HueyInstitute for Medical Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Veloo YuvaneswaryInstitute for Medical Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Pan SayanInstitute of Public Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Muhammad Fadhli Muhd YusoffInstitute of Public Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Lim Kuang KuayInstitute of Public Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ling Miaw YnInstitute of Public Health, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Cheong Kee CheeInstitute for Medical Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Ghazali Sumarni MohdInstitute for Medical Research, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Institute for Medical Research · MYSultan Haji Ahmad Shah Hospital · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePublic opinion and support can be powerful mandates for smoke-free policy. However, the scarcity of evidence on public opinion among Malaysians necessitates further investigation. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the level of support for smoke-free policy at various public domains and its associated factors among Malaysian adults.

designData were derived from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey, Malaysia (GATS-M). GATS-M is a nationwide study that employed a multistage, proportionate-to-size sampling strategy to select a representative sample of 5112 Malaysian adults aged 15 years and above. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with support for smoke-free policy in selected public domains that is, workplaces, restaurants, bars, hotels, casinos, karaoke centres, public transport terminals and shopping centres.

resultsThe level of support for enactment of a smoke-free policy at selected public domains varied from 37.8% to 94.4%, with the highest support was for gazetted smoke-free domains, namely, shopping centres (94.4%, 95% CI: 93.2% to 95.3%) and public transport terminals (85.2%, 95% CI: 83.3% to 86.9%). Multiple logistic regression revealed that non-smokers were more likely to support smoke-free policy at all domains. In addition, respondents who worked in workplaces with total or partial smoking restrictions were more likely to support a smoke-free policy ((total restriction adjusted OR (AOR): 14.94 (6.44 to 34.64); partial restriction AOR: 2.96 (1.138 to 6.35); non-restriction was applied as a reference).

conclusionA majority of the Malaysian adult population supported the smoke-free policy, especially at gazetted smoke-free domains. Therefore, expansion of a total smoking ban to workplaces, restaurants, bars, hotels, casinos and karaoke centres is strongly recommended to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke and to denormalise smoking behaviour.

Indexed as

Public OpinionSmoke-Free PolicyAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMalaysiaMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultgats-mlevel of supportsecond-hand smoke (shs)smoke-free policy

Identifiers

PMID30760510
PMCPMC6377523
OpenAlexW2911527894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.