Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30760252›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2019

Stress on facial skin of class III subjects during maxillary protraction: a finite element analysis.

Francesca Gazzani, Chiara Pavoni, Paola Cozza, Roberta Lione

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Efficacy of SAVE: A Novel Maxillary Protraction Device-A Finite Element Analysis.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Preoperative Evaluation of V-Y Flap Design Based on Computer-Aided Analysis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Francesca GazzaniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Via Collazia 29, 00183, Rome, Italy. francescagazzani@hotmail.it.ORCID 0000-0001-5220-8338
Chiara PavoniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Via Collazia 29, 00183, Rome, Italy.
Paola CozzaDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Via Collazia 29, 00183, Rome, Italy.
Roberta LioneDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome 'Tor Vergata', Via Collazia 29, 00183, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaxillary protraction with facemask (FM) is an orthopedic approach for treatment of Class III growing patients. Aim of the present investigation was to analyze tension loads produced by two different facial mask (FM) designs on facial skin of subject with skeletal Class III.

methodsA three-dimensional (3D) geometry of Delaire and Petit FM models were reconstructed from the original Computer Aided Design (CAD) 3D prototype using software package (ANSYS 5.7). A traction load of 9.8 N inclined of 30° to the occlusal plane was applied combining analytical FM models with a 3D facial model. Resulting stresses and deformations on the skin layer were tested through the von Mises yield criterion.

resultsOverall tensions were mostly developed on the chin area, while lower stresses were observed on forehead area for both FM designs. When Delaire FM model was tested, maximum stresses were observed on the upper border of the chin cup corresponding to the inferior lip and to marginal gingiva of lower incisors. After Petit FM application, maximum stresses were more extensively localized at the level of both upper border and central area of the chin. Stresses measured on the chin area were significantly higher with Petit FM when compared with Delaire FM (44 KPa versus 29 KPa, respectively).

conclusionsDelaire FM determined lower stresses and tensile tensions than Petit FM model. Highest tensions were observed at the level of chin cup area for both Delaire and Petit FM. Stresses following Delaire FM application were mostly observed on the upper border of the chin cup, while Petit FM determined stresses more extensively distributed to the central area of the chin.

Indexed as

FaceFinite Element AnalysisMalocclusion, Angle Class IIICephalometryExtraoral Traction AppliancesHumansMaxillaSkinFace maskFacial skin stressesFEM analysisMaxillary protraction

Identifiers

PMID30760252
PMCPMC6374895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.