Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30759964›Full record

ReviewThe Korean journal of internal medicine2019

A paradigm shift in studies based on rheumatoid arthritis clinical registries.

Soo-Kyung Cho, Yoon-Kyoung Sung

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Soo-Kyung ChoDepartment of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea.
Yoon-Kyoung SungDepartment of Rheumatology, Hanyang University Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development InstituteMinistry of Health and Welfare HI16C0061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical research is the study of aspects of patient health or illness that are closely related to clinical practice. In the late 20th and early 21th century, outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) improved dramatically due to breakthroughs in new drugs. Patient-reported outcome measures now play a significant role in the drug development process as study endpoints in clinical trials of new therapies, and this has led to increased interest in the patient's perspective, drug safety and treatment outcomes in clinical practice. In accordance with these needs, many prospective cohorts for RA patients and registries of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have been actively conducted in the United States and European and Asian countries. A gradual shift is taking place in the major outcomes of clinical research using these prospective cohorts and registries. This article will introduce representative registries for RA in each country set up in the early 2000s and will discuss future perspectives in clinical research on RA patients using such clinical registries.

Indexed as

Data MiningRegistriesAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidAsiaBiological ProductsEuropeHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRemission InductionRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsArthritis, rheumatoidBig dataCohort studiesPatients reported outcomesRegistries

Identifiers

PMID30759964
PMCPMC6718765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.