Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30759865›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2019

Bioactive Titanium Surfaces: Interactions of Eukaryotic and Prokaryotic Cells of Nano Devices Applied to Dental Practice.

Marco Cicciù, Luca Fiorillo, Alan Scott Herford, Salvatore Crimi, Alberto Bianchi, Cesare D'Amico, Luigi Laino, Gabriele Cervino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Biomimetic Coatings in Implant Dentistry: A Quick Update.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Passant Connection Screw of Dental Implants: AnBioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Dental Office Prevention of Coronavirus Infection.European journal of dentistry · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marco CicciùDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences Morphological and Functional Imaging, Messina University, 98100 Messina, ME, Italy. acromarco@yahoo.it.
Luca FiorilloDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences Morphological and Functional Imaging, Messina University, 98100 Messina, ME, Italy. lucafiorillo@live.it.
Alan Scott HerfordDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda 92354, CA, USA. aherford@llu.edu.
Salvatore CrimiDepartment of Biomedical and Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Catania University, 95123 Catania, CT, Italy. torecrimi@gmail.com.
Alberto BianchiDepartment of Biomedical and Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Catania University, 95123 Catania, CT, Italy. alberto.bianchi@unict.it.
Cesare D'AmicoDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences Morphological and Functional Imaging, Messina University, 98100 Messina, ME, Italy. cesaredamico89@gmail.com.
Luigi LainoDepartment of Experimental Medicine and Surgical Disciplines, Naples University, 80100 Naples, NA, Italy. luigi.laino@unicampania.it.
Gabriele CervinoDepartment of Biomedical and Dental Sciences Morphological and Functional Imaging, Messina University, 98100 Messina, ME, Italy. gcervino@unime.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, many advances have been made in the fields of bioengineering and biotechnology. Many methods have been proposed for the in vitro study of anatomical structures and alloplastic structures. Many steps forward have been made in the field of prosthetics and grafts and one of the most debated problems lies in the biomimetics and biocompatibility of the materials used. The contact surfaces between alloplastic material and fabric are under study, and this has meant that the surfaces were significantly improved. To ensure a good contact surface with the cells of our body and be able to respond to an attack by a biofilm or prevent the formation, this is the true gold standard. In the dental field, the study of the surfaces of contact with the bone tissue of the implants is the most debated, starting from the first concepts of osteointegration.

methodThe study searched MEDLINE databases from January 2008 to November 2018. We considered all the studies that talk about nanosurface and the biological response of the latter, considering only avant-garde works in this field.

resultsThe ultimate aim of this study is to point out all the progress made in the field of bioengineering and biotechnologies about nanosurface. Surface studies allow you to have alloplastic materials that integrate better with our body and allow more predictable rehabilitations. Particularly in the field of dental implantology the study of surfaces has allowed us to make huge steps forward in times of rehabilitation. Overcoming this obstacle linked to the time of osseointegration, however, today the real problem seems to be linked to the "pathologies of these surfaces", or the possible infiltration, and formation of a biofilm, difficult to eliminate, being the implant surface, inert.

conclusionsThe results of the present investigation demonstrated how nanotechnologies contribute substantially to the development of new materials in the biomedical field, being able to perform a large number of tests on the surface to advance research. Thanks to 3D technology and to the reconstructions of both the anatomical structures and eventually the alloplastic structures used in rehabilitation it is possible to consider all the mechanical characteristics too. Recent published papers highlighted how the close interaction between cells and the biomaterial applied to the human body is the main objective in the final integration of the device placed to manage pathologies or for rehabilitation after a surgical tumor is removed.

Indexed as

active surfacescellsdental devicesnanomedicinenanosurfacenanotechnologies

Identifiers

PMID30759865
PMCPMC6466189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.