Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30759423›Full record

ReviewBiofabrication2019

Electrobiofabrication: electrically based fabrication with biologically derived materials.

Jinyang Li, Si Wu, Eunkyoung Kim, Kun Yan, Huan Liu, Changsheng Liu, Hua Dong, Xue Qu, Xiaowen Shi, Jana Shen and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biofabrication, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jinyang LiInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, College Park, United States of America.
Si WuSchool of Resource and Environmental Science, Hubei International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Sustainable Resource and Energy, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Eunkyoung KimInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, College Park, United States of America.
Kun YanSchool of Resource and Environmental Science, Hubei International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Sustainable Resource and Energy, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Huan LiuKey Laboratory for Ultrafine Materials of Ministry of Education, The State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Changsheng LiuKey Laboratory for Ultrafine Materials of Ministry of Education, The State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hua DongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Engineering Research Center for Tissue Restoration and Reconstruction (NERC-TRR), Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering, School of Materials Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xue QuKey Laboratory for Ultrafine Materials of Ministry of Education, The State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xiaowen ShiSchool of Resource and Environmental Science, Hubei International Scientific and Technological Cooperation Base of Sustainable Resource and Energy, Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8294-2920
Jana ShenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, United States of America.
William E BentleyInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, College Park, United States of America.
Gregory F PayneInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, College Park, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6638-9459

Funding

Accessing molecular communication via synthetic biology and microelectronics – gut on a chip modelR21EB024102 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI BENTLEY, WILLIAM E. · 2017 to 2018
$412k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB024102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While conventional material fabrication methods focus on form and strength to achieve function, the fabrication of material systems for emerging life science applications will need to satisfy a more subtle set of requirements. A common goal for biofabrication is to recapitulate complex biological contexts (e.g. tissue) for applications that range from animal-on-a-chip to regenerative medicine. In these cases, the material systems will need to: (i) present appropriate surface functionalities over a hierarchy of length scales (e.g. molecular features that enable cell adhesion and topographical features that guide differentiation); (ii) provide a suite of mechanobiological cues that promote the emergence of native-like tissue form and function; and (iii) organize structure to control cellular ingress and molecular transport, to enable the development of an interconnected cellular community that is engaged in cell signaling. And these requirements are not likely to be static but will vary over time and space, which will require capabilities of the material systems to dynamically respond, adapt, heal and reconfigure. Here, we review recent advances in the use of electrically based fabrication methods to build material systems from biological macromolecules (e.g. chitosan, alginate, collagen and silk). Electrical signals are especially convenient for fabrication because they can be controllably imposed to promote the electrophoresis, alignment, self-assembly and functionalization of macromolecules to generate hierarchically organized material systems. Importantly, this electrically based fabrication with biologically derived materials (i.e. electrobiofabrication) is complementary to existing methods (photolithographic and printing), and enables access to the biotechnology toolbox (e.g. enzymatic-assembly and protein engineering, and gene expression) to offer exquisite control of structure and function. We envision that electrobiofabrication will emerge as an important platform technology for organizing soft matter into dynamic material systems that mimic biology's complexity of structure and versatility of function.

Indexed as

ElectricityBiocompatible MaterialsBiopolymersElectrochemistryElectrodesBiocompatible MaterialsBiopolymers

Identifiers

PMID30759423
PMCPMC7025432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.