Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30759151›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

The growing pains of physician-administration relationships in an academic medical center and the effects on physician engagement.

Eric J Keller, Brad Giafaglione, Howard B Chrisman, Jeremy D Collins, Robert L Vogelzang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. "I feel I have no voice": hospital doctors' workplace silence in Ireland.Journal of health organization and management · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Strategies for Cost Optimization in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric J KellerCenter for Bioethics & Medical Humanities, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Brad GiafaglionePhysician Engagement, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America.
Howard B ChrismanHuNamics, LLC, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America.
Jeremy D CollinsHuNamics, LLC, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America.
Robert L VogelzangHuNamics, LLC, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5684-7943

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysician engagement has become a key metric for healthcare leadership and is associated with better healthcare outcomes. However, engagement tends to be low and difficult to measure and improve. This study sought to efficiently characterize the professional cultural dynamics between physicians and administrators at an academic hospital and how those dynamics affect physician engagement. MATERIALS AND

methodsA qualitative mixed methods analysis was completed in 6 weeks, consisting of a preliminary analysis of the hospital system's history that was used to purposefully recruit 20 physicians across specialties and 20 healthcare administrators across management levels for semi-structured interviews and observation. Participation rates of 77% (20/26) and 83% (20/24) were achieved for physicians and administrators, respectively. Cohorts consisted of equal numbers of men and women with experience ranging from 1 to 35 years within the organization. Field notes and transcripts were systematically analyzed using an iterative inductive-deductive approach. Emergent themes were presented and discussed with approximately 400 physicians and administrators within the organization to assess validity and which results were most meaningful. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: This investigation indicated a professional cultural disconnect was undermining efforts to improve physician engagement. This disconnect was further complicated by a minority (10%) not believing an issue existed and conflicting connotations not readily perceived by participants who often offered similar solutions. Physicians and administrators felt these results accurately reflected their realities and used this information as a common language to plan targeted interventions to improve physician engagement. Limitations of the study included its cross-sectional nature with a modest sample size at a single institution.

conclusionsA qualitative mixed methods analysis efficiently identified professional cultural barriers within an academic hospital to serve as an institution-specific guide to improving physician engagement.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersInterprofessional RelationsWork EngagementAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Facility AdministratorsHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationLeadershipMaleMiddle AgedOccupational StressPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID30759151
PMCPMC6373942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.