ArticlePloS one2019
The growing pains of physician-administration relationships in an academic medical center and the effects on physician engagement.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leadership Behavior, Values Alignment, and Future Objective Turnover Among Physicians.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Back to the Future: Long-Term Leadership Lessons From the COVID-19 Pandemic.The Permanente journal · 2025Article
- Taking sides or bridging worlds? Managerial responses to conflicts and tensions between the core operations and the administration in healthcare.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Exploring Trust and Engagement: A Qualitative Evaluation of the Relationship Between Clinicians and Healthcare Leaders at Academic Medical Centers.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2025Article
- Tailoring a specific medical leadership development program for faculty members: the Lyon-Ottawa experience.Medical education online · 2024Article
- Physician perspectives of clinical performance feedback and impact on well-being: a qualitative exploration.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Private Equity and Radiology: Productive Partnership or Inherently Misaligned?Seminars in interventional radiology · 2023Review
- Exploring physician engagement in health care organizations: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Pediatric Faculty Engagement and Associated Areas of Worklife After a COVID19 Surge.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2023Article
- Alignment in the Hospital-Physician Relationship: A Qualitative Multiple Case Study of Medical Specialist Enterprises in the Netherlands.International journal of health policy and management · 2023Article
- "I feel I have no voice": hospital doctors' workplace silence in Ireland.Journal of health organization and management · 2021Article
- Assessment of the Association of Leadership Behaviors of Supervising Physicians With Personal-Organizational Values Alignment Among Staff Physicians.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Medical leadership: boon or barrier to organisational performance? A thematic synthesis of the literature.BMJ open · 2020Review
- Strategies for Cost Optimization in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysician engagement has become a key metric for healthcare leadership and is associated with better healthcare outcomes. However, engagement tends to be low and difficult to measure and improve. This study sought to efficiently characterize the professional cultural dynamics between physicians and administrators at an academic hospital and how those dynamics affect physician engagement. MATERIALS AND
methodsA qualitative mixed methods analysis was completed in 6 weeks, consisting of a preliminary analysis of the hospital system's history that was used to purposefully recruit 20 physicians across specialties and 20 healthcare administrators across management levels for semi-structured interviews and observation. Participation rates of 77% (20/26) and 83% (20/24) were achieved for physicians and administrators, respectively. Cohorts consisted of equal numbers of men and women with experience ranging from 1 to 35 years within the organization. Field notes and transcripts were systematically analyzed using an iterative inductive-deductive approach. Emergent themes were presented and discussed with approximately 400 physicians and administrators within the organization to assess validity and which results were most meaningful. RESULTS & DISCUSSION: This investigation indicated a professional cultural disconnect was undermining efforts to improve physician engagement. This disconnect was further complicated by a minority (10%) not believing an issue existed and conflicting connotations not readily perceived by participants who often offered similar solutions. Physicians and administrators felt these results accurately reflected their realities and used this information as a common language to plan targeted interventions to improve physician engagement. Limitations of the study included its cross-sectional nature with a modest sample size at a single institution.
conclusionsA qualitative mixed methods analysis efficiently identified professional cultural barriers within an academic hospital to serve as an institution-specific guide to improving physician engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.