ArticlePloS one2019
A unified framework for unconstrained and constrained ordination of microbiome read count data.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metagenomic profiling of microbial communities and the resistome within Egyptian hospital wastewater and tap water.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multidimensional scaling informed by F-statistic: Visualizing grouped microbiome data with inference.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Core Microbiome Assignments: Implications for Ecological Synthesis.mSystems · 2023Review
- llperm: a permutation of regressor residuals test for microbiome data.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- DivCom: A Tool for Systematic Partition of Groups of Microbial Profiles Into Intrinsic Subclusters and Distance-Based Subgroup Comparisons.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Revisiting the effect of PCR replication and sequencing depth on biodiversity metrics in environmental DNA metabarcoding.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Machine learning and applications in microbiology.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2021Review
- Soil microbial community structure and functionality changes in response to long-term metal and radionuclide pollution.Environmental microbiology · 2021Article
- Transfer of Antibiotic Resistance Plasmid from CommensalLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Model-based joint visualization of multiple compositional omics datasets.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020Article
- A Zero-Inflated Latent Dirichlet Allocation Model for Microbiome Studies.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Explorative visualization techniques provide a first summary of microbiome read count datasets through dimension reduction. A plethora of dimension reduction methods exists, but many of them focus primarily on sample ordination, failing to elucidate the role of the bacterial species. Moreover, implicit but often unrealistic assumptions underlying these methods fail to account for overdispersion and differences in sequencing depth, which are two typical characteristics of sequencing data. We combine log-linear models with a dispersion estimation algorithm and flexible response function modelling into a framework for unconstrained and constrained ordination. The method is able to cope with differences in dispersion between taxa and varying sequencing depths, to yield meaningful biological patterns. Moreover, it can correct for observed technical confounders, whereas other methods are adversely affected by these artefacts. Unlike distance-based ordination methods, the assumptions underlying our method are stated explicitly and can be verified using simple diagnostics. The combination of unconstrained and constrained ordination in the same framework is unique in the field and facilitates microbiome data exploration. We illustrate the advantages of our method on simulated and real datasets, while pointing out flaws in existing methods. The algorithms for fitting and plotting are available in the R-package RCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.