Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30759079›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

A systematic genetic screen identifies essential factors involved in nuclear size control.

Helena Cantwell, Paul Nurse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A quantitative and spatial analysis of cell cycle regulators during the fission yeast cycle.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Engineering spatiotemporal organization and dynamics in synthetic cells.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. DNA content contributes to nuclear size control inMolecular biology of the cell · 2020
    Article
  20. Organelle size scaling over embryonic development.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Helena CantwellCell Cycle Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7714-995X
Paul NurseCell Cycle Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9244-7787
The Francis Crick Institute · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK FC01121Medical Research Council FC01121Wellcome Trust 093917Wellcome Trust FC001121Wellcome Trust FC01121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear size correlates with cell size, but the mechanism by which this scaling is achieved is not known. Here we screen fission yeast gene deletion mutants to identify essential factors involved in this process. Our screen has identified 25 essential factors that alter nuclear size, and our analysis has implicated RNA processing and LINC complexes in nuclear size control. This study has revealed lower and more extreme higher nuclear size phenotypes and has identified global cellular processes and specific structural nuclear components important for nuclear size control.

Indexed as

Cell NucleusCell SizeCytoplasmCytoskeletonGene DeletionGene Expression Regulation, FungalGenetic TestingPhenotypeSchizosaccharomyces

Identifiers

PMID30759079
PMCPMC6391033
OpenAlexW2914401773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.