Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30758775›Full record

ArticleEating and weight disorders : EWD2019

Evidence for a perceptual mechanism relating body size misperception and eating disorder symptoms.

Joanna Alexi, Romina Palermo, Elizabeth Rieger, Jason Bell

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Future of Perceptual Dysregulation in Psychiatric Nosology.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Food Allergy, Eating Disorders and Body Image.Journal of affective disorders reports · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joanna AlexiSchool of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia. joanna.alexi@research.uwa.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4088-5977
Romina PalermoSchool of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Elizabeth RiegerResearch School of Psychology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 0200, Australia.
Jason BellSchool of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere are known and serious health risks associated with extreme body weights, including the development of eating disorders. Body size misperceptions are particularly evident in individuals with eating disorders, compared to healthy controls. The present research investigated whether serial dependence, a recently discovered bias in body size judgement, is associated with eating disorder symptomatology. We additionally examined whether this bias operates on holistic body representations or whether it works by distorting specific visual features.

methodsA correlational analysis was used to examine the association between serial dependence and eating disorder symptomatology. We used a within-subjects experimental design to investigate the holistic nature of this misperception. Participants were 63 young women, who judged the size of upright and inverted female body images using a visual analogue scale and then completed the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire (EDE-Q) to assess eating disorder symptoms.

resultsOur findings provide the first evidence of an association between serial dependence and eating disorder symptoms, with significant and positive correlations between body size misperception owing to serial dependence and EDE-Q scores, when controlling for Body Mass Index. Furthermore, we reveal that serial dependence is consistent with distortion of local visual features.

conclusionsFindings are discussed in relation to the broader theories of central coherence, cognitive inflexibility, and multisensory integration difficulties, and as providing a candidate mechanism for body size misperception in an eating disorder population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1, experimental study.

Indexed as

Self ConceptAdolescentAdultBody ImageBody Mass IndexBody SizeFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansPsychometricsSize PerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultBody inversion effectCognitive inflexibilityEating disorder symptomsSerial dependence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.