ArticleLung2019
Pirfenidone Therapy for Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Real-Life Study.
Article in Lung, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Real-world safety and effectiveness of pirfenidone and nintedanib in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Diagnostic and prognostic implications of family history of fibrotic interstitial lung diseases.Respiratory research · 2024Article
- Optimizing Screening for Early Disease Detection in Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis (FLORIS): A Prospective Cohort Study Design.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Telomere biology disorders.NPJ genomic medicine · 2021Review
- Possible value of antifibrotic drugs in patients with progressive fibrosing non-IPF interstitial lung diseases.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFamilial pulmonary fibrosis (FPF) is defined as an idiopathic diffuse parenchymal lung disease affecting two or more members of the same primary biological family. The aim of this study was to compare disease progression and tolerance to pirfenidone in a population of FPF patients who presented with radiological and/or histological evidence of UIP, and a group of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients.
methodsSeventy-three patients (19 with FPF and 54 with IPF) were enrolled and data were collected retrospectively at 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up.
resultsFPF patients were statistically younger and more frequently females. A significantly greater decline in FVC and DLCO was recorded in FPF than in IPF patients at 24 months follow-up. At the 6-min walking test, walked distance declined significantly in FPF patients than IPF at 24 months. No statistically significant differences in drug tolerance or side effects were recorded between groups.
conclusionDifferent rate of progression was observed in patients with IPF and FPF on therapy with pirfenidone; our findings may not be due to lack of effectiveness of therapy, but to the different natural history and evolution of these two conditions. Pirfenidone was well tolerated by FPF and IPF patients. Specific unbiased randomized clinical trials on larger populations to validate our preliminary exploratory results are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30758708What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.