ArticleCognitive research: principles and implications2019
How does navigation system behavior influence human behavior?
Article in Cognitive research: principles and implications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Get the unbalance right: asymmetric transfer effects in cognitive offloading.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2026Article
- RideGuide: multimodal conversational tour guide for passenger engagement and spatial learning in robotaxis.Journal on multimodal user interfaces · 2026Article
- [Risks and benefits of artificial intelligence in luminal endoscopy].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Evaluating route preview as an alternative to turn-by-turn navigation in pedestrian mobility.PloS one · 2026Article
- Neuroadaptive mobile geographic information displays: an emerging cartographic research frontier.International journal of cartography · 2025Article
- Mobile eye-tracking and neuroimaging technologies reveal teaching and learning on the move: bibliometric mapping and content analysis.Psychoradiology · 2025Review
- Fixation-related potentials during mobile map assisted navigation in the real world: The effect of landmark visualization style.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Towards neuroadaptive navigation assistance to reduce spatial de-skilling.Cognitive processing · 2024Article
- Calibration-Free Mobile Eye-Tracking Using Corneal Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- How Do In-Car Navigation Aids Impair Expert Navigators' Spatial Learning Ability?Annals of the American Association of Geographers · 2024Article
- Traffic jam by GPS: A systematic analysis of the negative social externalities of large-scale navigation technologies.PloS one · 2024Article
- Outsourcing Memory to External Tools: A Review of 'Intention Offloading'.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Review
- Using spontaneous eye blink-related brain activity to investigate cognitive load during mobile map-assisted navigation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Navigation systems are ubiquitous tools to assist wayfinders of the mobile information society with various navigational tasks. Whenever such systems assist with self-localization and path planning, they reduce human effort for navigating. Automated navigation assistance benefits navigation performance, but research seems to show that it negatively affects attention to environment properties, spatial knowledge acquisition, and retention of spatial information. Very little is known about how to design navigation systems for pedestrian navigation that increase both navigation performance and spatial knowledge acquisition. To this end, we empirically tested participants (N = 64) using four different navigation system behaviors (between-subject design). Two cognitive processes with varying levels of automation, self-localization and allocation of attention, define navigation system behaviors: either the system automatically executes one of the processes (high level of automation), or the system leaves the decision of when and where to execute the process to the navigator (low level of automation). In two experimental phases, we applied a novel empirical framework for evaluating spatial knowledge acquisition in a real-world outdoor urban environment. First, participants followed a route assisted by a navigation system and, simultaneously, incidentally acquired spatial knowledge. Second, participants reversed the route using the spatial knowledge acquired during the assisted phase, this time without the aid of the navigation system. Results of the route-following phase did not reveal differences in navigation performance across groups using different navigation system behaviors. However, participants using systems with higher levels of automation seemed not to acquire enough spatial knowledge to reverse the route without navigation errors. Furthermore, employing novel methods to analyze mobile eye tracking data revealed distinct patterns of human gaze behavior over time and space. We thus can demonstrate how to increase spatial knowledge acquisition without harming navigation performance when using navigation systems, and how to influence human navigation behavior with varying navigation system behavior. Thus, we provide key findings for the design of intelligent automated navigation systems in real-world scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.