Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30758673›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology2019

48 h for femur fracture treatment: are we choosing the wrong quality index?

Alessandro Aprato, Alessandro Casiraghi, Giovanni Pesenti, Marco Bechis, Alessandro Samuelly, Claudio Galante, Dario Capitani, Alessandro Massè

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. No rest for elderly femur fracture patients: early surgery and early ambulation decrease mortality.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alessandro ApratoSchool of Medicine, University of Turin, Viale 25 aprile 137 int 6, 10133, Turin, Italy. ale_aprato@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2514-4719
Alessandro CasiraghiNiguarda Ca' granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Giovanni PesentiNiguarda Ca' granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Marco BechisSchool of Medicine, University of Turin, Viale 25 aprile 137 int 6, 10133, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro SamuellySchool of Medicine, University of Turin, Viale 25 aprile 137 int 6, 10133, Turin, Italy.
Claudio GalanteNiguarda Ca' granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Dario CapitaniNiguarda Ca' granda Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro MassèSchool of Medicine, University of Turin, Viale 25 aprile 137 int 6, 10133, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the last 10 years, the rate of femur fractures treated within 48 h from trauma has been introduced as a performance index for hospital management in Italy. Literature showed a significant indirect correlation between early treatment and mortality/comorbidity. The aims of early treatment are pain management and reduction of time to ambulation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether early treatment has reduced time to ambulation in femur fracture. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients admitted to two level I trauma centers with proximal femoral fracture between 1/1/2017 and 31/12/2017 were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were patient age younger than 65 years, death before surgery, and nonsurgical treatment. The following data were collected: age, gender, date and time of admission to emergency department, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), type and side of fracture, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, date and time of surgery, surgical time, length of hospitalization, death during hospitalization, time from surgery to physiotherapy start, and time from surgery to first walking day.

resultsThe study sample resulted in 660 patients. Mean age was 82 years, 64 % were female, mean BMI was 24 kg/m

conclusionsEarly surgery in femur fracture became a priority in the health system. However, according to our data, although 51 % of patients were treated within the first 48 h, time from surgery to physiotherapy start (2 days) was still too long. Furthermore, time from surgery to first walking day was 6 days, longer than in most published papers. These data suggest that the performance index (rate of femur fractures treated within 48 h) may be improved by changing it to rate of femur fractures surgically treated with return to walking in 96 h. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4 (retrospective study).

Indexed as

Fracture FixationQuality Indicators, Health CareTime-to-TreatmentAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFemoral FracturesFemurHumansItalyLength of StayMaleOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsEarly treatmentFemur fractureWalking

Identifiers

PMID30758673
PMCPMC6375274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.