Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30758655›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2019

Association between the return-to-work hierarchy and self-rated health, self-esteem, and self-efficacy.

Inchul Jeong, Jin-Ha Yoon, Jaehoon Roh, Jeongbae Rhie, Jong-Uk Won

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Changes in Income after an Industrial Accident According to Industry and Return-to-Work Status.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inchul JeongDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8619-5034
Jin-Ha YoonDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Graduate School of Public Health, Institute for Occupational Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4198-2955
Jaehoon RohDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Graduate School of Public Health, Institute for Occupational Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4228-7209
Jeongbae RhieDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Dangook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2748-6835
Jong-Uk WonDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Graduate School of Public Health, Institute for Occupational Health, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. juwon@yuhs.ac.ORCID 0000-0002-9200-3297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to examine whether change of employer and/or job upon return-to-work after work-related injuries and diseases is related to health outcomes; self-rated health, self-esteem, and self-efficacy were used as indicators.

methodsData from the Panel Study of Workers' Compensation Insurance in Korea were used. A total of 1,610 workers who had returned to work after work-related injuries and diseases were included. The workers were divided into four groups according to their return-to-work characteristics: same employer, same job (n = 660); same employer, different job (n = 57); different employer, same job (n = 318); and different employer, different job (n = 575). Self-rated health, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and Self-Efficacy Scale scores were used as outcome variables. Logistic regression analysis was used.

resultsCompared to workers who had returned to the same employer and same job, those who had returned to the same employer but a different job were less likely to report good self-rated health (odds ratio [OR] 0.54; confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.97). Those returning to a different employer but the same job were less likely to report good self-rated health (0.47, 0.35-0.64) and high self-esteem (0.73, 0.55-0.96). Those returning to a different employer and different job were less likely to report good self-rated health (0.49, 0.38-0.63), high self-esteem (0.68, 0.54-0.86), and high self-efficacy (0.66, 0.52-0.83).

conclusionsChange of employer and/or job related to health outcomes. Returning to the same employer and same job should be set as a goal in the vocational rehabilitation process.

Indexed as

Health StatusSelf ConceptSelf EfficacyAdultEmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesOccupational InjuriesRepublic of KoreaReturn to WorkSelf ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesOccupational healthReturn-to-workSelf-efficacySelf-esteemVocational rehabilitation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.