ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2019
Social support network and continuity of care: an ego-network study of psychiatric service users.
Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Support-receiving networks and the isolation in schizophrenia: A preliminary study toward recovery-oriented occupational therapy.The British journal of occupational therapy · 2026Article
- The Influence of Provider Connectedness on Continuity of Care and Hospital Readmissions in Patients With COPD: A Claims Data Based Social Network Study.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2023Article
- The structure of social support: a multilevel analysis of the personal networks of people with severe mental disorders.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Article
- Social contacts, friends and satisfaction with friendships in patients with psychotic, mood and neurotic disorders 1 year after hospitalisation: data from five European countries.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2021Article
- Privacy-Preserving Social Ambiance Measure From Free-Living Speech Associates With Chronic Depressive and Psychotic Disorders.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Use of psychiatric hospitals and social integration of patients with psychiatric disorders: a prospective cohort study in five European countries.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2020Article
- Lack of alternative: Chinese first-time mothers' construction of social support network of online secondary groups.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFor severely mentally ill (SMI) users, continuity of care requires consistency between the supports provided by the members of their social support network. However, we know little about their network cohesion and its association with continuity of care. We set out to investigate this association and hypothesised that it would depend on the severity of the user's situation and on his/her living arrangements.
methodsWe conducted face-to-face interviews with 380 SMI users recruited in outpatient and inpatient mental health services in three areas in Belgium. Data regarding users' social networks were collected using an ego-network mapping technique and analysed with social network analysis. The cohesion indicators were density (frequency of connections between network members), centralisation (having a small number of central people), and egobetweenness (the user's centrality in his/her own network). Participants' perception of continuity of care was measured by the Alberta Continuity of Services Scale.
resultsResults show that cohesion indicators were associated with continuity of care only for users with high-severity problems, regardless of their living arrangements. The numbers of network members, professionals, and services in the network were all negatively associated with continuity of care for all the users.
conclusionsSatisfactory continuity of care requires fewer professionals or services in a user's network and a dense network for users with the most severe problems. This implies that those providing care must not only be able to increase cohesion within a network, but also to adapt their interventions to support the transition to a different, individualised network structure when severity decreases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30758541What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.