Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30758539›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2019

[Fast track strategies in hip arthroplasty].

U Nöth, T Geiser, T Kranich, E von Rottkay, J C Reichert, M Reyle-Hahn, L Rackwitz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Fast-Track-Arthroplasty].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. ['Hip-in-a-Day'].Der Orthopade · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

U NöthKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Stadtrandstraße 555, 13589, Berlin, Deutschland. ulrich.noeth@pgdiakonie.de.
T GeiserKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Stadtrandstraße 555, 13589, Berlin, Deutschland.
T KranichKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Stadtrandstraße 555, 13589, Berlin, Deutschland.
E von RottkayKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Stadtrandstraße 555, 13589, Berlin, Deutschland.
J C ReichertKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Stadtrandstraße 555, 13589, Berlin, Deutschland.
M Reyle-HahnKlinik für Anästhesie und interdisziplinäre Intensivmedizin, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Berlin, Deutschland.
L RackwitzKlinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Stadtrandstraße 555, 13589, Berlin, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFast track arthroplasty is becoming increasingly accepted in German-speaking countries. By optimizing treatment processes fast track programs promise faster recovery, increased patient satisfaction, quality improvement and reduction in the length of hospital stay.

objectivesThe philosophy and treatment principles of fast track hip arthroplasty during the pre, intra and postoperative phase are described in the light of the current body of evidence. The challenges concerning fast track arthroplasty within the German health system are discussed. MATERIAL AND

methodsBesides presenting our own data concerning a patient seminar and an opiate saving pain treatment, the most relevant literature related to fast track hip arthroplasty from a pubmed search is discussed.

resultsFast track concepts can only be successfully implemented through close interdisciplinary team work. Preoperatively, a patient seminar can help to prepare patients better for surgery. Postoperatively, early mobilisation and pain treatment play a central role, whereat a clear reduction in opiate application can be achieved.

conclusionFast track hip arthroplasty makes rethinking with respect to traditional treatment principles necessary and demands a high degree of interdisciplinary team work. Particularly, as result of the specifics of the health system (DRG system and stationary rehabilitation), a nationwide establishment in Germany has not taken place so far.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipGermanyHumansLength of StayPatient SatisfactionDRGEarly mobilizationEducation, patientFast trackPostoperative painTotal hip replacement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.