Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30758506›Full record

ArticleJAMA cardiology2019

Association of Statin Adherence With Mortality in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.

Fatima Rodriguez, David J Maron, Joshua W Knowles, Salim S Virani, Shoutzu Lin, Paul A Heidenreich

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 157 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fatima RodriguezDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
David J MaronDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Joshua W KnowlesDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Salim S ViraniMichael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Section of Cardiovascular Research, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Shoutzu LinVeterans Affairs Health System, Palo Alto, California.
Paul A HeidenreichDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Funding

Doris Duke Charitable Foundation 2016097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Statins decrease mortality in those with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), but statin adherence remains suboptimal. Objective: To determine the association between statin adherence and mortality in patients with ASCVD who have stable statin prescriptions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort analysis included patients who were between ages 21 and 85 years and had 1 or more International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for ASCVD on 2 or more dates in the previous 2 years without intensity changes to their statin prescription who were treated within the Veterans Affairs Health System between January 1, 2013, and April 2014. Exposures: Statin adherence was defined by the medication possession ratio (MPR). Adherence levels were categorized as an MPR of less than 50%, 50% to 69%, 70% to 89%, and 90% or greater. For dichotomous analyses, adherence was defined as an MPR of 80% or greater. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was death of all causes adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as adherence to other cardiac medications. Results: Of 347 104 eligible adults with ASCVD who had stable statin prescriptions, 5472 (1.6%) were women, 284 150 (81.9%) were white, 36 208 (10.4%) were African American, 16 323 (4.7%) were Hispanic, 4093 (1.2%) were Pacific Islander, 1293 (0.4%) were Native American, 1145 (0.3%) were Asian, and 1794 (0.5%) were other races. Patients taking moderate-intensity statin therapy were more adherent than patients taking high-intensity statin therapy (odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.16-1.20). Women were less adherent (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.84-0.94), as were minority groups. Younger and older patients were less likely to be adherent compared with adults aged 65 to 74 years. During a mean (SD) of 2.9 (0.8) years of follow-up, there were 85 930 deaths (24.8%). Compared with the most adherent patients (MPR ≥ 90%), patients with an MPR of less than 50% had a hazard ratio (HR; adjusted for clinical characteristics and adherence to other cardiac medications) of 1.30 (95% CI, 1.27-1.34), those with an MPR of 50% to 69% had an HR of 1.21 (95% CI, 1.18-1.24), and those with an MPR of 70% to 89% had an HR of 1.08 (95% CI, 1.06-1.09). Conclusions and Relevance: Using a national sample of Veterans Affairs patients with ASCVD, we found that a low adherence to statin therapy was associated with a greater risk of dying. Women, minorities, younger adults, and older adults were less likely to adhere to statins. Our findings underscore the importance of finding methods to improve adherence.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHospitalizationHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedMortalityOutcome Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30758506
PMCPMC6439552

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.