Observational studyJAMA cardiology2019
Association of Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Congenital Long QT Syndrome With Life-Threatening Arrhythmias in Japanese Patients.
Observational study in JAMA cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of empagliflozin versus placebo on cardiac sympathetic activity in acute myocardial infarction patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the EMBODY trial.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2020 · on this mapTrial
- Dissecting the causal effects of smoking, alcohol consumption, and related DNA methylation markers on electrocardiographic indices.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- Article
- Identification of a novel pathogenic variant inJournal of arrhythmia · 2023Article
- A Case Report: Two Young Children with Long QT Syndrome Type-2 Diagnosed by Presymptomatic Genetic Testing.Journal of pediatric genetics · 2022Article
- Clinical Genetics of Inherited Arrhythmogenic Disease in the Pediatric Population.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Personalized medicine for cardiovascular diseases.Journal of human genetics · 2021Review
- Territory-Wide Chinese Cohort of Long QT Syndrome: Random Survival Forest and Cox Analyses.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- First episode of ventricular fibrillation in an 84-year-old man with long-QT type 2 syndrome: A case report.Journal of cardiology cases · 2020Article
- Subcutaneous and transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator in high-risk long-QT syndrome type 3 associated with Val411Met mutation in SCN5A.Journal of cardiology cases · 2020Article
- Handling of Ventricular Fibrillation in the Emergency Setting.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2021-04-26Concerns/Issues about Authorship/Affiliation · Duplication of Data · Error in Analyses · Error in Data · Error in Results and/or Conclusions · Investigation by Company/Institution ·
- Commented on by
- Retracted
Authors and funding
38 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is caused by several ion channel genes, yet risk of arrhythmic events is not determined solely by the responsible gene pathogenic variants. Female sex after adolescence is associated with a higher risk of arrhythmic events in individuals with congenital LQTS, but the association between sex and genotype-based risk of LQTS is still unclear. Objective: To examine the association between sex and location of the LQTS-related pathogenic variant as it pertains to the risk of life-threatening arrhythmias. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective observational study enrolled 1124 genotype-positive patients from 11 Japanese institutions from March 1, 2006, to February 28, 2013. Patients had LQTS type 1 (LQT1), type 2 (LQT2), and type 3 (LQT3) (616 probands and 508 family members), with KCNQ1 (n = 521), KCNH2 (n = 487) and SCN5A (n = 116) genes. Clinical characteristics such as age at the time of diagnosis, sex, family history, cardiac events, and several electrocardiographic measures were collected. Statistical analysis was conducted from January 18 to October 10, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sex difference in the genotype-specific risk of congenital LQTS. Results: Among the 1124 patients (663 females and 461 males; mean [SD] age, 20 [15] years) no sex difference was observed in risk for arrhythmic events among those younger than 15 years; in contrast, female sex was associated with a higher risk for LQT1 and LQT2 among those older than 15 years. In patients with LQT1, the pathogenic variant of the membrane-spanning site was associated with higher risk of arrhythmic events than was the pathogenic variant of the C-terminus of KCNQ1 (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.19-2.17; P = .002), although this site-specific difference in the incidence of arrhythmic events was observed in female patients only. In patients with LQT2, those with S5-pore-S6 pathogenic variants in KCNH2 had a higher risk of arrhythmic events than did those with others (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.44-2.44; P < .001). This site-specific difference in incidence, however, was observed in both sexes. Regardless of the QTc interval, however, female sex itself was associated with a significantly higher risk of arrhythmic events in patients with LQT2 after puberty (106 of 192 [55.2%] vs 19 of 94 [20.2%]; P < .001). In patients with LQT3, pathogenic variants in the S5-pore-S6 segment of the Nav1.5 channel were associated with lethal arrhythmic events compared with others (HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 2.09-8.36; P < .001), but no sex difference was seen. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective analysis, pathogenic variants in the pore areas of the channels were associated with higher risk of arrhythmic events than were other variants in each genotype, while sex-associated differences were observed in patients with LQT1 and LQT2 but not in those with LQT3. The findings of this study suggest that risk for cardiac events in LQTS varies according to genotype, variant site, age, and sex.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.