ArticleJAMA surgery2019
Assessment of Trends in Transplantation of Liver Grafts From Older Donors and Outcomes in Recipients of Liver Grafts From Older Donors, 2003-2016.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- From mechanisms to anti-fibrotic drugs in hepatic stellate cell research: a global bibliometric analysis with patent and clinical perspectives (2000-2025).Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Pooled it
- Age and liver graft: a systematic review with meta-regression.Updates in surgery · 2023Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of the Literature on Chronic Kidney Disease Following Liver Transplantation.Annals of transplantation · 2022Pooled it
- Interactions Between Donor and Recipient age in Liver Transplantation: Implications for Donor and Recipient Matching.Transplantation · 2026Article
- Tailoring Liver Transplant Decisions: How Donor-Recipient Age Matching Influences Outcomes.Clinical transplantation · 2026Article
- Donor-recipient age mismatch and outcomes in liver transplantation: A scientific registry of transplant recipients database analysis.World journal of transplantation · 2025Article
- Temporal changes in obesity and outcomes for patients listed for liver transplant.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2025Article
- Elderly Ages in Liver Transplantation: Are Older Donors Really Higher Risk?Transplantation direct · 2025Article
- Prolonged allograft survival in liver transplantation.Surgery open science · 2025Article
- UW supplementation with AP39 improves liver viability following static cold storage.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Organ Utilization Rates from Non-Ideal Donors for Solid Organ Transplant in the United States.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Recipient Survival among Living Donor vs. Deceased Donor Liver Transplants for Acute Liver Failure in the United States.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Influence of donor age on liver transplantation outcomes: A multivariate analysis and comparative study.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Current Understanding of Marginal Grafts in Liver Transplantation.Aging and disease · 2024Review
- Changing landscape of liver transplant in the United States-Frontiers in transplantation · 2024Review
- Changing liver utilization and discard rates in clinical transplantation in the ex-vivo machine preservation era.Frontiers in medical technology · 2023Review
- Machine Perfusion for Extended Criteria Donor Livers: What Challenges Remain?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Aging deteriorated liver Ischemia and reperfusion injury by suppressing Tribble's proteins 1 mediated macrophage polarization.Bioengineered · 2022Article
- The impact of hepatitis C virus direct acting agents in liver transplant using very old donor grafts: a real-world single-center analysis.Updates in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: In light of the growing population of older adults in the United States, older donors (aged ≥70 years) represent an expansion of the donor pool; however, their organs are underused. Liver grafts from older donors were historically associated with poor outcomes and higher discard rates, but clinical protocols, organ allocation, and the donor pool have changed in the past 15 years. Objective: To evaluate trends in demographics, discard rates, and outcomes among older liver donors and transplant recipients of livers from older donors in a large national cohort. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prospective cohort study of 4127 liver grafts from older donors and 3350 liver-only recipients of older donor grafts and 78 990 liver grafts from younger donors (aged 18-69 years) and 64 907 liver-only recipients of younger donor grafts between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2016, in the United States. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, which includes data on all transplant recipients in the United States that are submitted by members of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, was used. Exposures: Year of liver transplant and age of liver donor. Main Outcomes and Measures: Odds of graft discard and posttransplant outcomes of all-cause graft loss and mortality. Results: In this study, 4127 liver grafts from older donors were recovered for liver transplant across the study period (2003-2016); 747 liver grafts from older donors were discarded, and 3350 liver grafts from older donors were used for liver-only recipients. After adjusting for donor characteristics other than age and accounting for Organ Procurement Organization-level variation, liver grafts from older donors were more likely to be discarded compared with liver grafts from younger donors in 2003-2006 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.97; 95% CI, 1.68-2.31), 2007-2009 (aOR, 2.55; 95% CI, 2.17-3.01), 2010-2013 (aOR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.68-2.46), and 2013-2016 (aOR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.96-2.86) (P < .001 for all). Transplants of liver grafts from older donors represented a progressively lower proportion of all adult liver transplants, from 6.0% (n = 258 recipients) in 2003 to 3.2% (n = 211 recipients) in 2016 (P = .001). However, outcomes in recipients of grafts from older donors improved over time, with 40% lower graft loss risk (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.53-0.68; P < .001) and 41% lower mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.52-0.68; P < .001) in 2010 through 2016 vs 2003 through 2009; these results were beyond the general temporal improvements in graft loss (interaction P = .03) and mortality risk (interaction P = .04) among recipients of liver grafts from younger donors. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings show that from 2003 to 2016, liver graft loss and mortality among recipients of liver grafts from older donors improved; however, liver graft discard from older donors remained increased and the number of transplants performed with liver grafts from older donors decreased. Expansion of the donor pool through broader use of liver grafts from older donors might be reasonable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.