Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30758471›Full record

ReviewArquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery2019

STAGES AND FACTORS OF THE "PERIOPERATIVE PROCESS": POINTS IN COMMON WITH THE AERONAUTICAL INDUSTRY.

Carlos Federico Davrieux, Mariano Palermo, Edgardo Serra, Eduardo Javier Houghton, Pablo Agustín Acquafresca, Caetano Finger, Mariano Eduardo Giménez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Effect of pharmacist care on clinical outcomes and therapy optimization in perioperative settings: A systematic review.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlos Federico DavrieuxFundación DAICIM (Docencia, Asistencia e Investigación en Cirugía Invasiva Mínima, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariano PalermoFundación DAICIM (Docencia, Asistencia e Investigación en Cirugía Invasiva Mínima, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Edgardo SerraFundación DAICIM (Docencia, Asistencia e Investigación en Cirugía Invasiva Mínima, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Eduardo Javier HoughtonFundación DAICIM (Docencia, Asistencia e Investigación en Cirugía Invasiva Mínima, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pablo Agustín AcquafrescaFundación DAICIM (Docencia, Asistencia e Investigación en Cirugía Invasiva Mínima, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Caetano FingerFundación DAICIM (Docencia, Asistencia e Investigación en Cirugía Invasiva Mínima, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariano Eduardo GiménezFundación DAICIM (Docencia, Asistencia e Investigación en Cirugía Invasiva Mínima, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aeronautical industry is one of the disciplines that most use control systems. Its purpose is to avoid accidents and return safer flights. The flight of an airplane, from its takeoff to its landing is a process divided into stages under strict control. A surgical procedure has the same characteristics. We try to identify and develop the stages of the surgical process using the experience of the aviation industry in order to optimize the results and reduce surgical complications.

aimTo identify and develop the stages of the surgical process so that they could be applied to surgery departments.

methodsA search, review and bibliographic analysis of the application of aeronautical control and safety to medical practice in general and to surgery, in particular, were carried out.

resultsSurgical process comprises the perioperative period. It is composed of Preoperative Stage (it is divided into 2 "sub-steps": hospital admission and control of preoperative studies) Operative Stage (it is divided into 3 "sub-steps": anesthetic induction, surgery, and anesthetic recovery) and Postoperative Stage (it is divided into 2 "sub-steps": control during hospitalization and ambulatory control). Two checkpoints must be developed. Checkpoint #1 would be located between the preoperative and operative stages, and checkpoint #2 would be located between the operative and postoperative stages. Surgical factors are surgeons, instrumental and technology, anesthesiology and operating room environment.

conclusionIt is possible and necessary to develop a systematic surgical procedure. Its application in the department of surgery could optimize the results and reduce the complications and errors related to daily practice.

Indexed as

ChecklistSafetyHumansPerioperative PeriodSurgical Procedures, Operative

Identifiers

PMID30758471
PMCPMC6368165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.