Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30758398›Full record

ArticleEinstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2019

Evaluation of the quality of Primary Health Care services for children: reflections on the feasibility of using the Brazilian version of the Primary Care Assessment Tool as a routine assessment tool.

Liz Ponnet, Sara Willems, Veerle Vyncke, Aylene Emilia Moraes Bousquat, Ana Luiza d'Ávila Viana, Guilherme Arantes Mello, Marcelo Demarzo

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liz PonnetUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0512-9036
Sara WillemsGhent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6349-7785
Veerle VynckeGhent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7687-6266
Aylene Emilia Moraes BousquatUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2701-1570
Ana Luiza d'Ávila VianaUniversidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4498-899X
Guilherme Arantes MelloUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5845-6463
Marcelo DemarzoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7447-1839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the quality of the Primary Health Care services provided to children and the feasibility of using the Brazilian version of Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT-Brazil) as a routine quality assessment tool.

methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out in Joanópolis, a small rural town in the State of São Paulo (SP), Brazil. Seven health professionals and 502 caretakers of children using the public health center were interviewed using the PCAT-Brazil, collecting data on the core and related attributes of Primary Health Care provided to children. The score of each attribute was calculated.

resultsCaretakers rated as good the following attributes; "degree of affiliation", "first contact care - use of services", "coordinated care", and "comprehensive care - available services". The attributes of "first contact accessibility", "long term person care", "comprehensive care - offered services" and "family- and community-oriented care" were scored as poor. The health professionals only rated the attribute of "first contact accessibility" as satisfactory, and considered that all other Primary Health Care attributes needed improvement. To conduct this study, at least 1,241 working hours were invested, and the estimated budget was R$12.900,00 (or U$3,953.00).

conclusionThe use of the PCAT-Brazil as a routine assessment and planning tool seemed to be not feasible in the given setting due to high costs, lack of trained personnel and the huge workload. To overcome the encountered obstacles, advices are given based on field experience.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdultBrazilCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesHealth PersonnelHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPrimary Health CareRural PopulationSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30758398
PMCPMC6438670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.