Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30758076›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical periodontology2019

Treatment of intrabony periodontal defects using rhFGF-2 in combination with deproteinized bovine bone mineral or rhFGF-2 alone: A 6-month randomized controlled trial.

Atsushi Saito, Takahiro Bizenjima, Takahiro Takeuchi, Eiichi Suzuki, Masahiro Sato, Kouki Yoshikawa, Yurie Kitamura, Daisuke Matsugami, Hideto Aoki, Daichi Kita and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical periodontology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Proteome-Guided Drug Target Discovery for Periodontitis.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Hyaluronic acidAnnals of translational medicine · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Atsushi SaitoDepartment of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0065-2207
Takahiro BizenjimaDepartment of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Takahiro TakeuchiDepartment of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Eiichi SuzukiDepartment of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro SatoDepartment of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Kouki YoshikawaDepartment of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Yurie KitamuraDepartment of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke MatsugamiDepartment of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideto AokiDepartment of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Daichi KitaDepartment of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro ImamuraDepartment of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Daisuke IrokawaDepartment of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumi SeshimaDepartment of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.
Sachiyo TomitaDepartment of Periodontology, Tokyo Dental College, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the use of recombinant human fibroblast growth factor (rhFGF)-2 in combination with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) compared with rhFGF-2 alone, in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with periodontitis who had received initial periodontal therapy and had intrabony defects of ≥ 3 mm in depth were enrolled. Sites were randomly assigned to receive a commercial formulation of 0.3% rhFGF-2 + DBBM (test) or rhFGF-2 alone (control). Clinical parameters and a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) were evaluated at baseline and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

resultsTwenty-two sites in each group were evaluated. A significant improvement in clinical attachment level (CAL) from baseline was observed in both groups at 6 months postoperatively. CAL gain was 3.16 ± 1.45 mm in the test group and 2.77 ± 1.15 mm in the control group, showing no significant difference between groups. Radiographic bone fill was significantly greater in the test group (47.2%) than in the control group (29.3%). No significant difference in PROM between groups was observed.

conclusionsAt 6 months, no significant difference in CAL gain or PROM between the two treatments was observed, although combination therapy yielded an enhanced radiographic outcome.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossBone SubstitutesPeriodontitisAnimalsCattleFollow-Up StudiesGuided Tissue Regeneration, PeriodontalHumansMineralsPeriodontal Attachment LossTreatment OutcomeBone SubstitutesMineralsbone graftdeproteinized bovine bone mineralFGF-2patient-reported outcomeperiodontal regenerationperiodontitis

Identifiers

PMID30758076
PMCPMC6899590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.