ArticleJournal of proteome research2019
An Improved Method for Measuring Absolute Metabolite Concentrations in Small Biofluid or Tissue Samples.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Principles of metabolome conservation in animals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Vitamin B6 Deficiency Promotes Loss of Heterozygosity (LOH) at the Drosophila warts (wts) LocusInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Metabolomics and health: from nutritional crops and plant-based pharmaceuticals to profiling of human biofluids.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021Review
- Adipose triglyceride lipase protects renal cell endocytosis in a Drosophila dietary model of chronic kidney disease.PLoS biology · 2021Article
- A novel method of sample homogenization with the use of a microtome-cryostat apparatus.RSC advances · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The measurement of absolute metabolite concentrations in small samples remains a significant analytical challenge. This is particularly the case when the sample volume is only a few microliters or less and cannot be determined accurately via direct measurement. We previously developed volume determination with two standards (VDTS) as a method to address this challenge for biofluids. As a proof-of-principle, we applied VDTS to NMR spectra of polar metabolites in the hemolymph (blood) of the tiny yet powerful genetic model Drosophila melanogaster. This showed that VDTS calculation of absolute metabolite concentrations in fed versus starved Drosophila larvae is more accurate than methods utilizing normalization to total spectral signal. Here, we introduce paired VDTS (pVDTS), an improved VDTS method for biofluids and solid tissues that implements the statistical power of paired control and experimental replicates. pVDTS utilizes new equations that also include a correction for dilution errors introduced by the variable surface wetness of solid samples. We then show that metabolite concentrations in Drosophila larvae are more precisely determined and logically consistent using pVDTS than using the original VDTS method. The refined pVDTS workflow described in this study is applicable to a wide range of different tissues and biofluids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.