Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30756316›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019

Laparoscopic Parenchymal-Sparing Hepatectomy: the New Maximally Minimal Invasive Surgery of the Liver-a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Jennifer A Kalil, Jennifer Poirier, Bjoern Becker, Robert Van Dam, Xavier Keutgen, Erik Schadde

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Modern therapeutic approaches for the treatment of malignant liver tumours.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer A KalilDepartment of Surgery - Transplant Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W. Congress Pkwy, Jelke Building 7th floor, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6304-4690
Jennifer PoirierDepartment of Surgery - Transplant Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W. Congress Pkwy, Jelke Building 7th floor, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Bjoern BeckerDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Brauerstr. 15, 8401, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Robert Van DamDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Xavier KeutgenDepartment of Surgery - Transplant Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W. Congress Pkwy, Jelke Building 7th floor, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Erik SchaddeDepartment of Surgery - Transplant Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1653 W. Congress Pkwy, Jelke Building 7th floor, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. erik.schadde@uzh.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParenchymal-sparing hepatectomies (PSH) are liver resections with preservation of as much liver parenchyma as possible. PSH can be performed laparoscopically (LPSH), but access to the posterosuperior segments is difficult and they are challenging when there are multiple bilobar lesions; the procedure may require repositioning and may be long and cumbersome. The objective of this systematic review is to analyze the feasibility and limitations of laparoscopic PSH in the literature.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed by searching Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Resections were categorized by segment(s), and data regarding operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, and R0 resection were analyzed.

resultsOf 351 studies screened for relevance, 48 studies were reviewed. Ten publications fulfilled inclusion criteria, reporting data from 579 patients undergoing LPSH. The most common indication was CRLM (58%) followed by hepatocellular carcinoma (16%). Only 92 patients were reported to have resections of more than one tumor; the maximum number of lesions resected was seven. Of resected lesions, 21.5% were located in the cranial segments. Mean operating time was 335.2 min, estimated blood loss was 462 cc, and hospital stay was 7.6 days. Conversion rate was 9.7%, and complications occurred in 19.4% of cases. No perioperative mortality was reported. R0 resections were achieved in 87.7% of cases.

conclusionLaparoscopic PSH is performed and reported, but the data quality is low so far. The main limitation of LPSH is the low number of lesions resected, especially for bilobar, metastatic disease. Prospective reports with tumor-specific oncological data are desirable.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalCarcinoma, HepatocellularColorectal NeoplasmsConversion to Open SurgeryHepatectomyHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayLiver NeoplasmsOperative TimeOrgan Sparing TreatmentsParenchymal TissuePostoperative ComplicationsColorectal liver metastasisLaparoscopic parenchymal-sparing hepatectomyParenchymal-sparing liver surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.