SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019
Laparoscopic Parenchymal-Sparing Hepatectomy: the New Maximally Minimal Invasive Surgery of the Liver-a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Short-term effects of modified ultrasonography in laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.iLIVER · 2024Article
- Laparoscopic versus open parenchymal sparing liver resections for high tumour burden colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score matched analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Indocyanine green fluorescence image-guided laparoscopic anatomical S2/3 resection using the TICGL technique.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Modern trends in minimally invasive versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis: an analysis of ACS-NSQIP.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Twenty-year experience in liver surgery in metastatic colorectal patients: a case series study in Ukraine.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Review
- Generic surgical process model for minimally invasive liver treatment methods.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Evolution of laparoscopic liver surgery: 20-year experience of a Norwegian high-volume referral center.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Feasibility and outcomes of multiple simultaneous laparoscopic liver resections.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Postoperative Outcomes After Laparoscopic Liver Resections in Low and High-Volume Centers: A Multicentric Case-Matched Comparative Study.World journal of surgery · 2022Article
- One-stage laparoscopic parenchymal sparing liver resection for bilobar colorectal liver metastases: safety, recurrence patterns and oncologic outcomes.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases - short- and long-term outcomes: A systematic review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
- Modern therapeutic approaches for the treatment of malignant liver tumours.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParenchymal-sparing hepatectomies (PSH) are liver resections with preservation of as much liver parenchyma as possible. PSH can be performed laparoscopically (LPSH), but access to the posterosuperior segments is difficult and they are challenging when there are multiple bilobar lesions; the procedure may require repositioning and may be long and cumbersome. The objective of this systematic review is to analyze the feasibility and limitations of laparoscopic PSH in the literature.
methodsA systematic review of the literature was performed by searching Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. Resections were categorized by segment(s), and data regarding operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, and R0 resection were analyzed.
resultsOf 351 studies screened for relevance, 48 studies were reviewed. Ten publications fulfilled inclusion criteria, reporting data from 579 patients undergoing LPSH. The most common indication was CRLM (58%) followed by hepatocellular carcinoma (16%). Only 92 patients were reported to have resections of more than one tumor; the maximum number of lesions resected was seven. Of resected lesions, 21.5% were located in the cranial segments. Mean operating time was 335.2 min, estimated blood loss was 462 cc, and hospital stay was 7.6 days. Conversion rate was 9.7%, and complications occurred in 19.4% of cases. No perioperative mortality was reported. R0 resections were achieved in 87.7% of cases.
conclusionLaparoscopic PSH is performed and reported, but the data quality is low so far. The main limitation of LPSH is the low number of lesions resected, especially for bilobar, metastatic disease. Prospective reports with tumor-specific oncological data are desirable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30756316What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.