Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30756239›Full record

ReviewMikrochimica acta2019

Graphene-derived nanomaterials as recognition elements for electrochemical determination of heavy metal ions: a review.

Yinxiu Zuo, Jingkun Xu, Xiaofei Zhu, Xuemin Duan, Limin Lu, Yongfang Yu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Tuning the Surface Functionality of FeSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Metal sensing-carbon dots loaded TiOScientific reports · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yinxiu ZuoJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Drug Design and Evaluation, School of Pharmacy, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang, 330013, Jiangxi, China.
Jingkun XuJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Drug Design and Evaluation, School of Pharmacy, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang, 330013, Jiangxi, China.
Xiaofei ZhuJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Drug Design and Evaluation, School of Pharmacy, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang, 330013, Jiangxi, China.
Xuemin DuanJiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Drug Design and Evaluation, School of Pharmacy, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang, 330013, Jiangxi, China. duanxuemin@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2556-039X
Limin LuKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education, Institute of Functional Materials and Agricultural Applied Chemistry, College of Science, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Nanchang, 330045, China. lulimin816@hotmail.com.
Yongfang YuKey Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education, Institute of Functional Materials and Agricultural Applied Chemistry, College of Science, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, Nanchang, 330045, China.

Funding

Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education GJJ170662National Natural Science Foundation of China 21665010National Natural Science Foundation of China 31741103National Natural Science Foundation of China 51762020Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province 20171ACB20026Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province 20171BAB203015Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province 20181BAB206015One Hundred Person Yuan Hang Project 2017Outstanding Youth Fund of Jiangxi Province 20162BCB23027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review (with 155 refs.) summarizes the progress made in the past few years in the field of electrochemical sensors based on graphene-derived materials for the determination of heavy metal ions. Following an introduction of this field and a discussion of the various kinds of modified graphenes including graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide, the review covers graphene based electrodes modified (or doped) with (a) heteroatoms, (b) metal nanoparticles, (c) metal oxides, (d) small organic molecules, (e) polymers, and (f) ternary nanocomposites. Tables are provided that afford an overview of representative methods and materials for fabricating electrochemical sensors. Furthermore, sensing mechanisms are discussed. A concluding section presents new perspectives, opportunities and current challenges. Graphical Abstract Schematic illustration of electrochemical sensor for heavy metal ion sensing based on heteroatom-doped graphene, metal-modified graphene, metal-oxide-modified graphene, organically modified graphene, polymer-modified graphene, and ternary graphene based nanocomposites.

Indexed as

CadmiumElectrochemical sensorGraphene oxideLeadMercuryMetalMetal oxidePolymerReduced graphene oxide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.