Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30756207›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2019

Water molecules in protein-ligand interfaces. Evaluation of software tools and SAR comparison.

Eva Nittinger, Paul Gibbons, Charles Eigenbrot, Doug R Davies, Brigitte Maurer, Christine L Yu, James R Kiefer, Andreas Kuglstatter, Jeremy Murray, Daniel F Ortwine and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Accelerated Hydration Site Localization and Thermodynamic Profiling.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. WatFinder: a ProDy tool for protein-water interactions.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. WaterKit: Thermodynamic Profiling of Protein Hydration Sites.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. TWN-FS method: A novel fragment screening method for drug discovery.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  13. Recent PELE Developments and Applications in Drug Discovery Campaigns.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eva NittingerUniversität Hamburg, ZBH - Center for Bioinformatics, Bundesstraße 43, 20146, Hamburg, Germany. nittinger@zbh.uni-hamburg.de.ORCID 0000-0001-7231-7996
Paul GibbonsGenentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. gibbons.paul@gene.com.
Charles EigenbrotGenentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA. charleseigenbrot@comcast.net.
Doug R DaviesBeryllium Discovery, 7869 NE Day Road West, Bainbridge Island, WA, 98110, USA.
Brigitte MaurerGenentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Christine L YuGenentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
James R KieferGenentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Andreas KuglstatterF. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070, Basel, Switzerland.
Jeremy MurrayGenentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Daniel F OrtwineGenentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.
Yong TangConstellation Pharmaceuticals, 215 First Street, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Vickie TsuiGenentech, 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA, 94080, USA.

Funding

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) pp.711-759P41GM103393 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HODGSON, KEITH O · 2012 to 2019
$30.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103393
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeting the interaction with or displacement of the 'right' water molecule can significantly increase inhibitor potency in structure-guided drug design. Multiple computational approaches exist to predict which waters should be targeted for displacement to achieve the largest gain in potency. However, the relative success of different methods remains underexplored. Here, we present a comparison of the ability of five water prediction programs (3D-RISM, SZMAP, WaterFLAP, WaterRank, and WaterMap) to predict crystallographic water locations, calculate their binding free energies, and to relate differences in these energies to observed changes in potency. The structural cohort included nine Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) structures, and nine bromodomain structures. Each program accurately predicted the locations of most crystallographic water molecules. However, the predicted binding free energies correlated poorly with the observed changes in inhibitor potency when solvent atoms were displaced by chemical changes in closely related compounds.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, MolecularAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseCrystallography, X-RayLigandsProtein BindingProtein DomainsProtein Kinase InhibitorsSoftwareSolventsStructure-Activity RelationshipThermodynamicsWaterAgammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine KinaseLigandsProtein Kinase InhibitorsSolventsWater3D-RISMBRDBromodomainBruton’s Tyrosine kinaseBTKSZMAPWaterWaterFLAPWaterMapWater placementWater predictionWaterRankWater scoring

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.