ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019
Does FDG PET/CT have a role in determining adjuvant chemotherapy in surgical margin-negative stage IA non-small cell lung cancer patients?
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic value of TLR from FDG PET/CT in patients with margin-negative stage IB and IIA non-small cell lung cancer.European radiology · 2023Article
- Lack of Adherence to Guideline-Based Imaging Before Subsequent Radiation in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Impact on Patient Outcomes.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023Article
- The tumor-to-liver ratio of the standardized uptake value is a useful FDG-PET/CT parameter for predicting malignant intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2022Article
- Influence of Semiquantitative [Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Design and optimisation of a small-molecule TLR2/4 antagonist for anti-tumour therapy.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2021Article
- 2-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Glucose Metabolism Reprogramming of Primary Tumor and the Liver Is Associated With Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Early NSCLC.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Ethnic Disparities in Imaging Utilization at Diagnosis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2020Article
- First-line treatment selection with organoids of anJournal of thoracic disease · 2020Review
- PD-L1 expression correlation with metabolic parameters of FDG PET/CT and clinicopathological characteristics in non-small cell lung cancer.EJNMMI research · 2020Article
- Gene variant profiles and tumor metabolic activity as measured by FOXM1 expression and glucose uptake in lung adenocarcinoma.Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2020Article
- The PET-Derived Tumor-to-Liver Standard Uptake Ratio (SUVFrontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the prognostic value of FDG PET/CT metabolic parameter compared to clinico-pathological risk factors in surgical margin-negative stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.
methods167 patients with consecutive FDG PET/CT scans from 2009 to 2015 performed for staging of NSCLC stage IA with plans for curative surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of primary tumor and mean SUV of liver were acquired from PET/CT. Tumor-to-liver SUV ratio (TLR) was calculated. Charts were reviewed to obtain basic patient characteristics (age, sex, smoking history, LDH, histologic subtype) and high-risk factors for adjuvant chemotherapy (tumor size, poorly differentiation, vascular invasion, and sub-lobar resection). Patients were dichotomized into two groups using optimal cut-off from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of TLR to predict recurrence. Statistical analysis was done using Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier method. Factors with P < 0.2 in univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis.
resultsRecurrence rate was 12.6% (21/167). Median disease-free survival (DFS) was 47.2 months while 2-year and 5-year DFS rates were 93% and 86%, respectively. The optimal cut-off for TLR was 2.3. In univariate analysis, P value of sex, vascular invasion, and TLR were less than 0.2. In multivariable analysis, high TLR was the only factor that showed significant association with tumor recurrence (hazard ratio 3.795, P = 0.0048).
conclusionsTLR was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence and TLR could be an important risk factor to be considered in decision-making for adjuvant chemotherapy, even for those with stage IA NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.