Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30756168›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2019

Efficacy of a new strength training design: the 3/7 method.

Séverine Stragier, Stéphane Baudry, Alain Carpentier, Jacques Duchateau

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05696990 (3/7 Resistance Training Method in Cardiac Rehabilitation of Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05696990 nacompletednot on this map

3/7 Resistance Training Method in Cardiac Rehabilitation of Coronary Artery Disease and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité Libre de BruxellesRan2019 to 2023Enrolled112ConditionsHeart Failure, Coronary Artery DiseaseArms3/7 Resistance Training Method, 3X9 Resistance Training Method
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Séverine StragierLaboratory of Applied Biology and Neurophysiology, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, CP 640, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Stéphane BaudryLaboratory of Applied Biology and Neurophysiology, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, CP 640, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Alain CarpentierLaboratory for Biometry and Exercise Nutrition, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, CP 640, 1070, Brussels, Belgium.
Jacques DuchateauLaboratory of Applied Biology and Neurophysiology, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), 808 route de Lennik, CP 640, 1070, Brussels, Belgium. jduchat@ulb.ac.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0336-6644
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study investigated the efficacy of a new strength training method on strength gain, hypertrophy, and neuromuscular fatigability.

methodsThe training exercise consisted of elbow flexion against a load of ~ 70% of one repetition maximal (1RM). A new method (3/7 method) consisting of five sets of an increasing number of repetitions (3 to 7) during successive sets and brief inter-set intervals (15 s) was repeated two times after 150 s of recovery and compared to a method consisting of eight sets of six repetitions with an inter-set interval of 150 s (8 × 6 method). Subjects trained two times per week during 12 weeks. Strength gain [1RM load and maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MVC)], EMG activity of biceps brachii and brachioradialis, as well as biceps' brachii thickness were measured. Change in neuromuscular fatigability was assessed as the maximal number of repetitions performed at 70% of 1RM before and after training.

resultsBoth 3/7 and 8 × 6 methods increased 1RM load (22.2 ± 7.4 and 12.1 ± 6.6%, respectively; p < 0.05) and MVC force (15.7 ± 8.2 and 9.5 ± 9.5%; p < 0.05) with a greater 1RM gain (p < 0.05) for the 3/7 method. Normalized (%M

conclusionThe 3/7 method provides a better stimulus for strength gain and muscle hypertrophy than the 8 × 6 method.

Indexed as

Muscle StrengthAdolescentAdultElbowFemaleHumansIsometric ContractionMuscle FatigueMuscle, SkeletalPhysical Conditioning, HumanElectromyographyFatigabilityHypertrophyMuscle strengthNear-infrared spectroscopyUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID30756168
OpenAlexW2911709825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.