Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30755825›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Turtles of the genera

Sofia Mazzoleni, Barbora Augstenová, Lorenzo Clemente, Markus Auer, Uwe Fritz, Peter Praschag, Tomáš Protiva, Petr Velenský, Lukáš Kratochvíl, Michail Rovatsos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Sex chromosome evolution among amniotes: is the origin of sex chromosomes non-random?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sofia MazzoleniDepartment of Ecology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Barbora AugstenováDepartment of Ecology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lorenzo ClementeDepartment of Ecology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Markus AuerMuseum of Zoology, Senckenberg, Dresden, Germany.
Uwe FritzMuseum of Zoology, Senckenberg, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6740-7214
Peter PraschagTurtle Island, Graz, Austria.
Tomáš Protivalandsnails.org, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr VelenskýPrague Zoological Garden, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lukáš KratochvílDepartment of Ecology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-3515-729X
Michail RovatsosDepartment of Ecology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8429-5680
Charles University · CZSenckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden · DEPrague Zoo · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For a long time, turtles of the family Geoemydidae have been considered exceptional because representatives of this family were thought to possess a wide variety of sex determination systems. In the present study, we cytogenetically studied

Indexed as

Comparative genome hybridizationEvolutionFISHKaryotypeMicrosatelliteSex chromosomesSex determinationTelomeresTurtles

Identifiers

PMID30755825
PMCPMC6368832
OpenAlexW2912861459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.