ArticleScientific reports2019
Multicentre MDR Elizabethkingia anophelis isolates: Novel random amplified polymorphic DNA with capillary electrophoresis systems to rapid molecular typing compared to genomic epidemiology analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eravacycline and omadacycline Rescue multidrug-resistant Elizabethkingia anophelis: Triple-Model evaluation across in Vitro, Galleria mellonella, and murine bacteremia systems.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a hierarchical machine learning method using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for rapid SCCmec typing and PVL detection in MRSA: a multi-centre study.Emerging microbes & infections · 2025Article
- Effect of Molecular Weight of Fluorescent Dyes on DNA Separation by Capillary Electrophoresis.Journal of fluorescence · 2025Article
- Usefulness of Capillary Gel Electrophoresis-Based PCR for Detection ofGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Population genomics of emergingEmerging microbes & infections · 2022Article
- Antibiotic susceptibility and genetic relatedness of Shigella species isolated from food and human stool samples in Qazvin, Iran.BMC research notes · 2021Article
- The integration of metabolome and proteome reveals bioactive polyphenols and hispidin in ARTP mutagenized Phellinus baumii.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Elizabethkingia species are ubiquitous bacteria that uncommonly cause human infection. Elizabethkingia anophelis was first identified in 2011 from the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. The currently available bacterial typing systems vary greatly with respect to labour, cost, reliability, and ability to discriminate among bacterial strains. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based fingerprinting using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) is commonly used to identify genetic markers. To our knowledge, no system coupling RAPD-PCR and capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE) has been utilized for the epidemiological typing of E. anophelis. Thus, the aim of the present study was to establish a reliable and reproducible molecular typing technique for E. anophelis isolates based on a multi-centre assessment of bacteraemia patients. Here, we used a rapid CGE-light-emitting diode-induced fluorescence (LEDIF)-based method in conjunction with RAPD-PCR to genotype E. anophelis with a high level of discrimination. All clinical isolates of E. anophelis were found to be typeable, and isolates from two hospitals formed two distinct clusters. The results demonstrated the potential of coupling RAPD and CGE as a rapid and efficient molecular typing tool, providing a reliable method for surveillance and epidemiological investigations of bacterial infections. The proposed method shows promise as a novel, cost-effective, high-throughput, first-pass typing method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.