Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30755688›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Integrating experimental and distribution data to predict future species patterns.

Jonne Kotta, Jarno Vanhatalo, Holger Jänes, Helen Orav-Kotta, Luca Rugiu, Veijo Jormalainen, Ivo Bobsien, Markku Viitasalo, Elina Virtanen, Antonia Nyström Sandman and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Methods to estimate marine functional connectivity: A primer.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jonne KottaEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Mäealuse 14, EE-12618, Tallinn, Estonia. jonne@sea.ee.ORCID 0000-0002-4970-6755
Jarno VanhataloDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics and Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Program, University of Helsinki, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6831-0211
Holger JänesEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Mäealuse 14, EE-12618, Tallinn, Estonia.
Helen Orav-KottaEstonian Marine Institute, University of Tartu, Mäealuse 14, EE-12618, Tallinn, Estonia.
Luca RugiuDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, FIN-20014, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9675-7168
Veijo JormalainenDepartment of Biology, University of Turku, FIN-20014, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6346-2585
Ivo BobsienGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Markku ViitasaloFinnish Environment Institute, FIN-00251, Helsinki, Finland.
Elina VirtanenFinnish Environment Institute, FIN-00251, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-9702-6677
Antonia Nyström SandmanAquaBiota Water Research, Löjtnantsgatan 25, SE-11550, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4511-6176
Martin IsaeusAquaBiota Water Research, Löjtnantsgatan 25, SE-11550, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sonja LeidenbergerEcological Modelling Group, School of Bioscience, University of Skövde, SE-54128, Skövde, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3985-8405
Per R JonssonDepartment of Marine Sciences - Tjärnö, University of Gothenburg, Tjärnö, SE-45296, Strömstad, Sweden.
Kerstin JohannessonDepartment of Marine Sciences - Tjärnö, University of Gothenburg, Tjärnö, SE-45296, Strömstad, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive species distribution models are mostly based on statistical dependence between environmental and distributional data and therefore may fail to account for physiological limits and biological interactions that are fundamental when modelling species distributions under future climate conditions. Here, we developed a state-of-the-art method integrating biological theory with survey and experimental data in a way that allows us to explicitly model both physical tolerance limits of species and inherent natural variability in regional conditions and thereby improve the reliability of species distribution predictions under future climate conditions. By using a macroalga-herbivore association (Fucus vesiculosus - Idotea balthica) as a case study, we illustrated how salinity reduction and temperature increase under future climate conditions may significantly reduce the occurrence and biomass of these important coastal species. Moreover, we showed that the reduction of herbivore occurrence is linked to reduction of their host macroalgae. Spatial predictive modelling and experimental biology have been traditionally seen as separate fields but stronger interlinkages between these disciplines can improve species distribution projections under climate change. Experiments enable qualitative prior knowledge to be defined and identify cause-effect relationships, and thereby better foresee alterations in ecosystem structure and functioning under future climate conditions that are not necessarily seen in projections based on non-causal statistical relationships alone.

Indexed as

AnimalsClimate ChangeEcosystemFucusHerbivorySeaweed

Identifiers

PMID30755688
PMCPMC6372580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.