Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30755687›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Revisit Population-based and Family-based Genotype Imputation.

Ching-Ti Liu, Xuan Deng, Virginia Fisher, Nancy Heard-Costa, Hanfei Xu, Yanhua Zhou, Ramachandran S Vasan, L Adrienne Cupples

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ching-Ti LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. ctliu@bu.edu.
Xuan DengDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Virginia FisherDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Nancy Heard-CostaDepartment of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9730-0306
Hanfei XuDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Yanhua ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Ramachandran S VasanDepartment of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
L Adrienne CupplesDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. adrienne@bu.edu.

Funding

Whole Genome Sequence Imputation in Families for Echocardioagraphic TraitsR21HL121589 · NHLBI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI CUPPLES, L. ADRIENNE, RAMACHANDRAN, VASAN S · 2013 to 2014
$237k
THE FRAMINGHAM HEART STUDY-N01HC25195-268025195-268025195N01HC025195 · HC · TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY · PI WOLF, PHILIP A · 2002 to 2006
–
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201500001CNHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201500001INHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC025195NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL121589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-Wide Association (GWA) with population-based imputation (PBI) has been successful in identifying common variants associated with complex diseases; however, much heritability remains to be explained and low frequency variants (LFV) may contribute. To identify LFV, a study of unrelated individuals may no longer be as efficient as a family study, where rare population variants can be frequent in families. Family-based imputation (FBI) provides an opportunity to evaluate LFV. To compare the performance of PBI and FBI, we conducted extensive simulations, generating genotypes using SeqSIMLA from various reference panels for families. We masked genotype information for variants unavailable in Framingham 550 K GWA genotype data in less informative subjects selected by GIGI-Pick. We implemented IMPUTE2 with duoHMM in SHAPEIT (Impute2_duoHMM) for PBI, MERLIN and GIGI for FBI and PedBLIMP for a hybrid approach. In general, FBI in both MERLIN and GIGI outperformed other approaches with imputation accuracy greater than 0.99 for the squared correlation and imputation quality scores (IQS) especially for LFV, although imputation accuracy from MERLIN depends on pedigree splitting for larger families. PBI performed worst with the exception of good imputation accuracy for common variants when a closely ancestry matched reference is used. In summary, linkage disequilibrium (LD) information from large available genotype resources provides good imputation for common variants with well-selected reference panels without requiring densely sequenced data in family members, while imputation of LFV with FBI benefits more from information on inheritance patterns within families yielding better imputation.

Indexed as

GenotypeAlgorithmsGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLinkage DisequilibriumPedigreePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID30755687
PMCPMC6372660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.