Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30755541›Full record

SynthesisMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019

Comparison of the Use of Vonoprazan and Proton Pump Inhibitors for the Treatment of Peptic Ulcers Resulting from Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hui-Si He, Bing-Yang Li, Qi-Tong Chen, Chun-Yan Song, Jian Shi, Bin Shi

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Analysis of Endoscopy Findings to Identify Early Gastric Cancers with Tumor Budding: A Retrospective Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hui-Si HeNaval Clinical Medicine Grade 2014, Basic Medical College, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Bing-Yang LiNaval Clinical Medicine Grade 2014, Basic Medical College, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Qi-Tong ChenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Chun-Yan SongDepartment of Pathology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Jian ShiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Bin ShiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China (mainland).
Second Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Currently, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-line treatment for ulcers resulting from endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Vonoprazan is a new oral potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerance of vonoprazan with PPIs in the treatment of peptic ulcers resulting from ESD. MATERIAL AND METHODS Published results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing vonoprazan with PPIs in the treatment of ulcers resulting from ESD were identified up to March 2018. The main clinical endpoints evaluated were healing rate and adverse events. The meta-analysis included quality assessment of the studies, statistical analysis of endpoints, and sensitivity analysis using Revman version 5.3 meta-analysis software. RESULTS Systematic literature review identified seven published studies that included 548 patients. Five studies were published as full-text manuscripts, and two studies were published as abstracts. Meta-analysis of the vonoprazan treatment, compared with PPI treatment, for ESD showed that the pooled relative risk (RR) of healing rate was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.33-1.22) for the 4-week study group and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.84-1.15) for the 8-week study group. The RR for adverse events was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.31-1.38) (P>0.05). No statistical evidence of publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS The findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of vonoprazan was comparable with PPIs for the treatment of peptic ulcers following ESD. Further studies are required to support the safety and efficacy of vonoprazan compared with different types of PPIs.

Indexed as

Endoscopic Mucosal ResectionHumansPeptic UlcerPostoperative ComplicationsProton Pump InhibitorsPyrrolesStomach NeoplasmsSulfonamidesTreatment OutcomeWound Healing1-(5-(2-fluorophenyl)-1-(pyridin-3-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrol-3-yl)-N-methylmethanamineProton Pump InhibitorsPyrrolesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID30755541
PMCPMC6381807
OpenAlexW2912703731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.