ArticleTrials2019
Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Gross Hemorrhage and Transfusions of Spine Surgeries (TARGETS): study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.
Article in Trials, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03011866 (Intravenous Versus Topical Use of Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Gross Hemorrhage and Transfusions of Spine Surgeries), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Intravenous Versus Topical Use of Tranexamic Acid in Reducing Gross Hemorrhage and Transfusions of Spine Surgeries (TARGETS) : A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Head-to-head Comparison Study
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intravenous versus topical tranexamic acid in spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Pooled it
- Tranexamic acid given into wound reduces postoperative drainage, blood loss, and hospital stay in spinal surgeries: a meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2021Pooled it
- Advances in surgical hemostasis: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis on topical tranexamic acid in spinal deformity surgery.Neurosurgical review · 2021Pooled it
- Comparison of Intravenous versus Topical Tranexamic Acid in Nondeformity Spine Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2020Pooled it
- The efficacy and safety of intravenous tranexamic acid in patients with posterior operation of multilevel thoracic spine stenosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Trial
- Risk factors for hidden blood loss in unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion : a single-center retrospective study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Hidden blood loss of minimally invasive hybrid lumbar interbody fusion: an analysis of influencing factors.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Review
- Analysis of risk factors for perioperative hidden blood loss in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Castigating intraoperative bleeding: Tranexamic acid, a new ally.Asian journal of neurosurgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTranexamic acid (TXA) has been routinely delivered in multisegmental spinal decompression and bone graft fusion surgeries with satisfactory outcomes in minimizing gross blood loss and transfusion demands. However, concerns remain that intravenously delivered TXA (ivTXA) may increase risks of postoperative convulsive seizures and systemic thrombogenicity. Topical use of TXA (tTXA), being more targeted to the surgical bleeding site while minimizing patient systemic exposure to ivTXA, has been successfully applied to attenuate blood losses and transfusion requirements in hip and knee arthroplasty. Yet, randomized controlled trials on tTXA efficacy and safety are still lacking in spinal surgeries. With this knowledge gap, we hypothesize that tTXA exhibits non-inferiority to ivTXA in blood conservation and clinical safety in multisegmental spinal decompression and bone graft fusion surgeries.
methodsA prospective, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study design will be adopted. The target sample size is 176. Eligible patients will be randomly allocated to receive either ivTXA or tTXA treatment. The primary end point is the perioperative total blood loss. Secondary end points consist of visible blood losses (intraoperative, postoperative 0-24 h, postoperative 0-48 h, combined perioperative blood loss, total postoperative blood loss), postoperative hidden blood loss, plasma TXA levels, postoperative conventional coagulation monitoring (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fiber Bragg grating, international normalized ratio), postoperative thromboelastography monitoring (reaction time, clot formation time, clot strength, fibrinolysis), postoperative hemoglobin nadir (within postoperative 48 h), perioperative transfusion amounts and rates, and length of hospital stay. Safety end points will be monitored too. DISCUSSION: This proposed study will contribute to expanding clinical evidences of tTXA for bleeding management in major spinal surgeries. This will be a high-quality prospective randomized trial with sufficient sample size, strict methodology, and few design deficits. It will investigate the potentiality of tTXA as an alternative to ivTXA in improving the current standard of care in multisegmental spinal surgeries, thereby optimizing the enhanced recovery after surgery scheme in spinal surgeries.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03011866 . Registered on 5 January 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.