Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30755180›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

Different next-generation sequencing pipelines based detection of tumor DNA in cerebrospinal fluid of lung adenocarcinoma cancer patients with leptomeningeal metastases.

Mengxi Ge, Qiong Zhan, Zhenzhen Zhang, Xiaoyu Ji, Xinli Zhou, Ruofan Huang, Xiaohua Liang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Osimertinib and Capmatinib Combination Therapy to OvercomeJTO clinical and research reports · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Leptomeningeal Disease.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mengxi GeDepartment of Oncology, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qiong ZhanDepartment of Oncology, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Zhenzhen ZhangSinglera Genomics Inc., Shanghai, China.
Xiaoyu JiDepartment of Oncology, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xinli ZhouDepartment of Oncology, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ruofan HuangDepartment of Oncology, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China. ruofanhuang@fudan.edu.cn.
Xiaohua LiangDepartment of Oncology, Huashan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Xinli_zhou73@163.com.
Fudan University · CNHuashan Hospital · CNSinotech Genomics (China) · CN

Funding

Baoshan District Committee of Science and Technology 14-E-28Scientific Research Foundation Huashan Hosipital 787Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation 16ZR1404300Shanghai Municipal Population and Family Planning Commission 201440584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nucleic acid mutation status in intracranial metastasis is markedly significant clinically. The goal of the current study was to explore whether the tumor-associated mutations can be detected by different next-generation sequencing (NGS) pipelines in paired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma samples from lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM).

methodsPaired CSF cell free DNA (cfDNA), CSF cells, plasma and formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of primary tumors were collected from 29 LAC patients with LM to detect the mutations by different NGS pipelines.

resultsDNA libraries were generated successfully for 79 various samples in total for NGS sequencing, of which mutations were detected in 7 plasma samples (24.14%), 12 CSF cfDNA samples (66.67%), and 10 CSF cells (76.9%) samples. For the 26 patients with detected mutations, 8/26(30.77%) had mutations in plasma, which was significantly lower than that those from CSF cfDNA (12/15, 80.00%), CSF cells (10/11, 90.91%) and FFPE samples (13/17, 76.47%). When the input DNA of CSF cells was less than 20 ng, the cHOPE pipeline of NGS identified the most mutations for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).

conclusionsNGS-based detection of mutations in cfDNA or cells from CSF provided more information than from plasma samples from LAC patients with LM. In addition, the cHOPE pipeline performed better than the other three NGS pipelines when input DNA from CSF cells was low.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedCirculating Tumor DNAEarly Detection of CancerErbB ReceptorsFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMeningeal CarcinomatosisMiddle AgedMutationCirculating Tumor DNAEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsCerebrospinal fluidCSF cellsLeptomeningeal metastasesLung adenocarcinoma cancerNGS pipelines

Identifiers

PMID30755180
PMCPMC6373107
OpenAlexW2947902245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.