ArticleBMC neurology2019
Early risk assessment of circulating endothelial progenitor cells and plasma stromal cell-derived factor-1 for nondisabling ischemic cerebrovascular events.
Article in BMC neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional Impairment of Endothelial Colony Forming Cells (ECFC) in Patients with Severe Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease (ASCVD).International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- The Differentiation of Pluripotent Stem Cells towards Endothelial Progenitor Cells - Potential Application in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.International journal of stem cells · 2022Article
- Role of Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1 in Endothelial Progenitor Cell-Mediated Vascular Repair and Regeneration.Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine · 2021Review
- Characterization and Functional Assessment of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Ischemic Stroke Patients.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEndothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) play an important role in ischemic stroke. However, there are few studies on the relationship between EPC and nondisabling ischemic cerebrovascular events. Our aim was to investigate the association of EPCs and SDF-1 (serum stromal cell-derived factor-1) with NICE (nondisabling ischemic cerebrovascular events).
methodsTIA (transient ischemic attack) and minor stroke patients (153 in total) who had an onset of symptoms within 1 day were consecutively collected. 83 of the patients were categorized into the HR-NICE (high-risk nondisabling ischemic cerebrovascular event) group, and 70 of the patients were in the NHR-NICE (non-high-risk nondisabling ischemic cerebrovascular events) group. Adopted FCM (flow cytometry) was used to measure EPCs, taking double-positive CD34/KDR as EPCs. ELISA was used to measure the concentrations of serum SDF-1 and VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor). By the sequence of admission time, 15 patients were selected separately from the HR-NICE group and NHR-NICE group, and another 15 healthy volunteers were chosen as the NC (Normal Control) group. The MTT method was used to measure the proliferation of EPCs of peripheral blood in all groups, and the Boyden chamber was used to measure the migration of EPCs.
resultsCompared with the NHR-NICE group, the HR-NICE group was older and contained more patients with hypertension and diabetes. Triglyceride, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein in the HR-NICE group were also higher. For factors such as smoking, BMI (body mass index), and HCY (homocysteine), there were no significant differences (P > 0.05). Circulating EPCs, SDF-1, and VEGF in the NHR-NICE group were all higher. According to the multifactor regression analysis, age, hypertension, diabetes, total cholesterol, EPCs, and SDF-1 are independent risk factors for HR-NICE. For EPCs of 48-h isolated cultures, proliferation and migration were observed to be weakened compared with those of the NC group (P < 0.05). EPCs in HR-NICE group had lower proliferation and migration than those in NHR-NICE group (P < 0.01).
conclusionsFor TIA and minor stroke patients, circulating EPCs and serum SDF-1 concentrations can be used to prognose HR-NICE. Factors that lead to high-risk NICE might be relevant to the decrease in proliferation and migration of circulating EPCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.