ReviewThe Journal of nutrition2019
Best Practices for Dietary Supplement Assessment and Estimation of Total Usual Nutrient Intakes in Population-Level Research and Monitoring.
Review in The Journal of nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03400436 (Development of a Total Nutrient Index), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Development of a Total Nutrient Index
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary intake of vitamins B1, B2, B3, and B6, and the risk of gastric cancer: pooled analyses within the Stomach cancer Pooling (Stop) project.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Application of the Total Nutrient Index as a Precision Nutrition Tool to Address Dietary Recommendations Across the Life Course.Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Associated Factors of Excessive Dietary Supplement Use Among Japanese Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Article
- Vitamin D Intake from Foods, Supplements, and Food Sources: Findings from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos.The Journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Folate intake, tissue levels, and colorectal cancer deaths in a national cohort established before folic acid fortification.European journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Methods matter for dietary supplement exposure assessment: comparing prevalence, product types, and amounts of nutrients from dietary supplements in the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in the American Association of Retired Persons cohort study.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Article
- Analyzing dietary exposure to critical nutrients on a plant-based diet using the food- and total nutrient index.Nutrition journal · 2025Article
- The Potential for Bouillon Fortification to Reduce Dietary Micronutrient Inadequacy: Modeling Analyses Using National Survey Data from Cameroon, Ghana, and Haiti.Current developments in nutrition · 2024Article
- The Evolution of Science and Regulation of Dietary Supplements: Past, Present, and Future.The Journal of nutrition · 2024Review
- Consumption of Dietary Supplements among Working-Age Residents of Lithuania in the Period from 2021 to 2023.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Minimum Dietary Diversity for Adolescents: Multicountry Analysis to Define Food Group Thresholds Predicting Micronutrient Adequacy among Girls and Boys Aged 10-19 Years.Current developments in nutrition · 2024Article
- Is Dietary (Food) Supplement Intake Reported in European National Nutrition Surveys?Nutrients · 2023Review
- Higher intake of certain nutrients among older adults is associated with better cognitive function: an analysis of NHANES 2011-2014.BMC nutrition · 2023Article
- Observational
- Maternal Intake of Vitamin D Supplements during Pregnancy and Pubertal Timing in Children: A Population-Based Follow-Up Study.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Major Gaps in Understanding Dietary Supplement Use in Health and Disease.Annual review of nutrition · 2023Review
- Usual nutrient intakes and diet quality among United States older adults participating in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program compared with income-eligible nonparticipants.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2023Article
- Folate and vitamin B12 usual intake and biomarker status by intake source in United States adults aged ≥19 y: NHANES 2007-2018.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2023Article
- Trends in Overall and Micronutrient-Containing Dietary Supplement Use in US Adults and Children, NHANES 2007-2018.The Journal of nutrition · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of dietary supplements (DS) is pervasive and can provide substantial amounts of micronutrients to those who use them. Therefore when characterizing dietary intakes, describing the prevalence of inadequacy or excess, or assessing relations between nutrients and health outcomes, it is critical to incorporate DS intakes to improve exposure estimates. Unfortunately, little is known about the best methods to assess DS, and the structure of measurement error in DS reporting. Several characteristics of nutrients from DS are salient to understand when comparing to those in foods. First, DS can be consumed daily or episodically, in bolus form and can deliver discrete and often very high doses of nutrients that are not limited by energy intakes. These characteristics contribute to bimodal distributions and distributions severely skewed to the right. Labels on DS often provide nutrient forms that differ from those found in conventional foods, and underestimate analytically derived values. Finally, the bioavailability of many nutrient-containing DS is not known and it may not be the same as the nutrients in a food matrix. Current methods to estimate usual intakes are not designed specifically to handle DS. Two temporal procedures are described to refer to the order that nutrient intakes are combined relative to usual intake procedures, referred to as a "shrinking" the distribution to remove random error. The "shrink then add" approach is preferable to the "add then shrink" approach when users and nonusers are combined for most research questions. Stratifying by DS before usual intake methods is another defensible option. This review describes how to incorporate nutrient intakes from DS to usual intakes from foods, and describes the available methods and fit-for-purpose of different analytical strategies to address research questions where total usual intakes are of interest at the group level for use in nutrition research and to inform policy decisions. Clinical Trial Registry: NCT03400436.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.