Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30753679›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2019

Cognitive outcomes in meningioma patients undergoing surgery: individual changes over time and predictors of late cognitive functioning.

Sophie J M Rijnen, Ikram Meskal, Marjan Bakker, Wouter De Baene, Geert-Jan M Rutten, Karin Gehring, Margriet M Sitskoorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mapping Cognitive Oncology: A Decade of Trends and Research Fronts.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sophie J M RijnenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Ikram MeskalDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Marjan BakkerDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Wouter De BaeneDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Geert-Jan M RuttenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Karin GehringDepartment of Neurosurgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
Margriet M SitskoornDepartment of Cognitive Neuropsychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeningioma patients are known to face cognitive deficits before and after surgery. We examined individual changes in cognitive performance over time and identified preoperative predictors of cognitive functioning 12 months after surgery in a large sample of meningioma patients.

methodsPatients underwent neuropsychological assessment (NPA) using CNS Vital Signs 1 day before (T0) and 3 (T3) and 12 (T12) months after surgery. Patients' sociodemographically corrected scores on 7 cognitive domains were compared with performance of a normative sample using one-sample z tests and chi-square tests of independence. Reliable change indices with correction for practice effects were calculated for individual patients. Linear mixed effects models were used to identify preoperative predictors of performance at T12.

resultsAt T0, 261 patients were assessed, and 229 and 82 patients were retested at T3 and T12, respectively. Patients showed impaired cognitive performance before and after surgery, and although performance improved on the group level, cognitive scores remained significantly lower than in the normative sample up to T12. On the individual level, performance remained stable in the majority of patients. Better preoperative performance, younger age, male sex, and higher educational level predicted better late cognitive performance.

conclusionsMeningioma patients face serious and persistent pre- and postsurgical cognitive deficits. A preoperative NPA together with sociodemographic characteristics may provide valuable information on the late cognitive outcome of individual meningioma patients. These results can help to inform patients and clinicians on late cognitive outcomes at an early stage, and emphasizes the importance of presurgical NPA and timely cognitive rehabilitation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesCognition DisordersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosiscognitionindividual changesmeningiomapredictorsreliable change index

Identifiers

PMID30753679
PMCPMC6620637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.